Taylor Kathleen M, Joseph Victory, Zhao Alice S, Balsam Peter D
Columbia University, United States.
University of California, San Diego, United States.
Behav Processes. 2014 Jan;101:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
Previous research suggests animals may integrate temporal information into mental representations, or temporal maps. We examined the parameters under which animals integrate temporal information in three appetitive conditioning experiments. In Experiment 1 the temporal relationship between 2 auditory cues was established during sensory preconditioning (SPC). Subsequently, rats were given first order conditioning (FOC) with one of the cues. Results showed integration of the order of cues between the SPC and FOC training phases. In subsequent experiments we tested the hypothesis that quantitative temporal information can be integrated across phases. In Experiment 2, SPC of two short auditory cues superimposed on a longer auditory cue was followed by FOC of either one of the short cues, or of the long cue at different times in the cue. Contrary to our predictions we did not find evidence of integration of temporal information across the phases of the experiment and instead responding to the SPC cues in Experiment 2 appeared to be dominated by generalization from the FOC cues. In Experiment 3 shorter auditory cues were superimposed on a longer duration light cue but with asynchronous onset and offset of the superimposed cues. There is some evidence consistent with the hypothesis that quantitative discrimination of whether reward should be expected during the early or later parts of a cue could be integrated across experiences. However, the pattern of responding within cues was not indicative of integration of quantitative temporal information. Generalization of expected times of reward during FOC seems to be the dominant determinant of within-cue response patterns in these experiments. Consequently, while we clearly demonstrated the integration of temporal order in the modulation of this dominant pattern we did not find strong evidence of integration of precise quantitative temporal information. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Associative and Temporal Learning.
先前的研究表明,动物可能会将时间信息整合到心理表征或时间地图中。我们在三项奖赏性条件反射实验中研究了动物整合时间信息的参数。在实验1中,在感觉预适应(SPC)期间建立了两个听觉线索之间的时间关系。随后,对大鼠进行其中一个线索的一级条件反射(FOC)。结果表明,在SPC和FOC训练阶段之间线索顺序发生了整合。在后续实验中,我们检验了定量时间信息可以跨阶段整合的假设。在实验2中,两个短听觉线索叠加在一个较长听觉线索上进行SPC,随后对其中一个短线索或在该线索的不同时间对长线索进行FOC。与我们的预测相反,我们没有发现实验各阶段时间信息整合的证据,相反,实验2中对SPC线索的反应似乎主要由FOC线索的泛化主导。在实验3中,较短的听觉线索叠加在持续时间较长的光线索上,但叠加线索的起始和结束不同步。有一些证据与以下假设一致,即关于在线索的早期或后期是否应预期奖赏的定量辨别可以跨经验进行整合。然而,线索内的反应模式并不表明定量时间信息的整合。在这些实验中,FOC期间预期奖赏时间的泛化似乎是线索内反应模式的主要决定因素。因此,虽然我们清楚地证明了时间顺序在这种主导模式调制中的整合,但我们没有发现精确的定量时间信息整合的有力证据。本文是名为:联想与时间学习的特刊的一部分。