Suppr超能文献

内镜治疗术后胆管损伤:单中心经验。

Endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct injuries: a single center experience.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Center, Mansoura University, Jehan St, 35516, Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt.

出版信息

Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan-Mar;16(1):19-24. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.58763.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Biliary endoscopic procedures may be less invasive than surgery for management of postoperative bile duct injuries (POBDI). This retrospective work presents the experience of a single referral center during a period of 14 years in endoscopic management of POBDI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1994 (March) and 2008 (May), ERCP had been performed on 277 patients suspected to have POBDI. Patients shown to have complete transaction of bile duct were prepared for definitive surgery. For patients with simple biliary leak, sphincterotomy was performed with stenting. Pneumatic dilatation and stenting were done on patients with biliary stricture and preserved ductal continuity. ERCP was repeated every 3 months till the site of narrowing disappeared.

RESULTS

The mean age was 45.3 years, 162 (58.5%) were females. The most common previous surgery was cholecystectomy (open, [N=119] 44%, and laparoscopic, [N=77] 28%). ERCP failed in 17 patients (6.1%). For successfully cannulated cases (N=260, 93.9%), the type of bile duct injury diagnosed at ERCP was completely ligated CBD (N=31/260 , 11.9%). Bile leakage was detected in (N=167/260, 64.2%) all patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stent insertion, the leak stopped in all of them. Biliary stricture was diagnosed in 33/260 patients (12.7%) and 17 of them had repeated balloon dilatation with stenting while the remaining had surgical correction. The success rate of endoscopic therapy for biliary strictures was 82%. Cholangiogram was normal in 29 patients (11.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic therapy is safe and effective in the management of postoperative bile duct leak. For postoperative bile ductal strictures, ERCP is a less favorable option.

摘要

背景/目的:与手术相比,胆道内镜治疗可能对术后胆管损伤(POBDI)的管理更具侵入性。本回顾性研究介绍了一家转诊中心在 14 年期间对 POBDI 进行内镜管理的经验。

材料和方法

1994 年 3 月至 2008 年 5 月期间,对 277 例疑似 POBDI 的患者进行了 ERCP。对于完全胆管切开的患者,准备进行确定性手术。对于单纯胆漏患者,行括约肌切开并支架置入。对于保留胆管连续性的胆管狭窄患者,行气动扩张和支架置入。狭窄部位消失前,每 3 个月重复进行 ERCP。

结果

患者平均年龄为 45.3 岁,162 例(58.5%)为女性。最常见的既往手术为胆囊切除术(开腹[119 例,44%]和腹腔镜[77 例,28%])。17 例(6.1%)患者 ERCP 失败。对于成功插管的患者(260 例,93.9%),ERCP 诊断的胆管损伤类型为完全结扎 CBD(260 例,11.9%)。所有行内镜括约肌切开和支架置入的患者均检测到胆漏(167/260,64.2%),所有患者胆漏均停止。33 例(260 例,12.7%)患者诊断为胆管狭窄,其中 17 例行反复球囊扩张和支架置入,其余患者行手术矫正。内镜治疗胆管狭窄的成功率为 82%。29 例(11.2%)患者胆管造影正常。

结论

内镜治疗在 POBDI 术后胆管漏的管理中是安全有效的。对于术后胆管狭窄,ERCP 是一个不太理想的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验