Erkan Serkan, Wu Chunhui, Mehbod Amir A, Cho Woojin, Transfeldt Ensor E
Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 May;23(3):180-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819c48a4.
An in vitro biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebrae.
To compare the biomechanics of transpedicular and extrapedicular approaches in polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in terms of height restoration, strength, and stiffness.
Cement is typically injected through a transpedicular approach in both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures. Previous biomechanical studies were primarily focused on the transpedicular approach. Extrapedicular approach has been recently developed to provide more symmetric cement filling and has good clinical results. However, no biomechanical data are available to compare these 2 techniques.
Twenty-four osteoporotic vertebral bodies were randomly divided into 2 groups for either transpedicular or extrapedicular vertebroplasty. Six lumbar and 6 thoracic vertebrae were used for each group. Each vertebral body was compressed by 25% of its original height and its strength and stiffness were measured. The vertebral bodies were treated with polymethylmethacrylate using either transpedicular or extrapedicular approach. The height restoration was measured before the treated vertebrae were recompressed to determine posttreatment strength and stiffness.
Both techniques increased vertebral strength by approximately 50% of the intact strength. There was no statistical difference in posttreatment strength between these 2 techniques. However, the transpedicular technique had higher stiffness recovery (70% to 80%) from the intact stiffness than the extrapedicular technique (60%). The extrapedicular approach achieved greater height restoration in thoracic vertebrae.
Both extrapedicular and transpedicular techniques increased strength but reduced stiffness compared with the intact condition. The extrapedicular technique achieved greater height restoration possibly attributed to its easier access to the fracture site. These biomechanical data provide useful information when selecting an approach for cement injection in vertebroplasty procedures.
一项使用骨质疏松症尸体椎体的体外生物力学研究。
比较经椎弓根和椎弓根外入路在聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯椎体成形术中的生物力学,包括高度恢复、强度和刚度。
在椎体成形术和后凸成形术过程中,骨水泥通常通过经椎弓根入路注入。以往的生物力学研究主要集中在经椎弓根入路。椎弓根外入路是最近开发的,以提供更对称的骨水泥填充,并且具有良好的临床效果。然而,尚无生物力学数据可用于比较这两种技术。
将24个骨质疏松症椎体随机分为两组,分别进行经椎弓根或椎弓根外椎体成形术。每组使用6个腰椎椎体和6个胸椎椎体。每个椎体压缩其原始高度的25%,并测量其强度和刚度。使用经椎弓根或椎弓根外入路对椎体进行聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯治疗。在对治疗后的椎体重新压缩以确定治疗后的强度和刚度之前,测量高度恢复情况。
两种技术均使椎体强度增加至完整强度的约50%。这两种技术在治疗后的强度上没有统计学差异。然而,经椎弓根技术从完整刚度恢复的刚度(70%至80%)高于椎弓根外技术(60%)。椎弓根外入路在胸椎中实现了更大的高度恢复。
与完整状态相比,椎弓根外和经椎弓根技术均增加了强度但降低了刚度。椎弓根外技术实现了更大的高度恢复,这可能归因于其更容易进入骨折部位。这些生物力学数据为椎体成形术过程中选择骨水泥注入入路提供了有用的信息。