Medical Affairs and Clinical Research, Ipca Laboratories Limited, Kandivli Industrial Estate, Kandivli (West), Mumbai 400067, India.
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(2):123-31. doi: 10.2165/11531770-000000000-00000.
Epidemiological studies and clinical trials have shown that prevention of cardiovascular disease, the ultimate goal of hypertension treatment, requires a sufficient reduction in blood pressure.
The primary objective of this study was to compare the mean decrease in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure between metoprolol extended release (XL)/amlodipine fixed-dose combination and losartan plus amlodipine combination in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The secondary objectives of this study were to compare the proportion of responders in the two treatment groups and to evaluate the tolerability of the study medications.
This was a randomized, parallel-group, multicentre comparative study conducted at the outpatient departments of three teaching hospitals in India. Patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (defined as DBP 90-109 mmHg) aged between 18 and 75 years were enrolled in this study and followed up for 12 weeks. Response to study treatments was evaluated in terms of mean decrease in SBP and DBP and the response rate (reduction to SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg).
Out of 152 patients who underwent a 1-week placebo washout, 148 eligible patients were randomized to receive either metoprolol XL 25 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg fixed-dose combination (76 patients) or losartan 25 mg plus amlodipine 2.5 mg (72 patients). The two treatment groups were similar with respect to demographic and baseline characteristics. Non-responders after 4 weeks of therapy were escalated to metoprolol XL 50 mg/amlodipine 5 mg fixed-dose combination or losartan 50 mg plus amlodipine 5 mg, respectively. The study was completed by 66 patients in each group, of whom 43 patients in each group responded to the starting doses. After 4 weeks' therapy, both treatments were associated with significant decreases in SBP and DBP from baseline (p < 0.001) and were comparable with respect to mean decrease in SBP (p = 0.304), mean decrease in DBP (p = 0.630) and response rate (p = 1.0). Also, both the step-up therapies were comparable with respect to mean decrease in SBP (p = 0.484), mean decrease in DBP (p = 0.650) and response rate (p = 0.134) at week 12. Both treatments were well tolerated in the studied population.
Metoprolol XL/amlodipine fixed-dose combination was found to be as effective and well tolerated as losartan plus amlodipine in the treatment of essential hypertension.
流行病学研究和临床试验表明,预防心血管疾病是高血压治疗的最终目标,这需要充分降低血压。
本研究的主要目的是比较美托洛尔控释片/氨氯地平固定剂量复方与氯沙坦加氨氯地平联合治疗轻中度原发性高血压患者的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)平均降低情况。本研究的次要目的是比较两组治疗的应答比例,并评估研究药物的耐受性。
这是一项在印度三所教学医院的门诊部进行的随机、平行分组、多中心比较研究。年龄在 18 至 75 岁之间的轻中度高血压(定义为 DBP 90-109mmHg)患者入组本研究,并随访 12 周。根据 SBP 和 DBP 的平均降低以及应答率(降低至 SBP<140mmHg 和 DBP<90mmHg)来评估治疗应答。
在进行为期 1 周的安慰剂洗脱期后,152 名患者中有 148 名符合条件的患者被随机分配接受美托洛尔控释片 25mg/氨氯地平 2.5mg 固定剂量复方(76 名患者)或氯沙坦 25mg 加氨氯地平 2.5mg(72 名患者)。两组治疗在人口统计学和基线特征方面相似。治疗 4 周后无应答的患者分别升级为美托洛尔控释片 50mg/氨氯地平 5mg 固定剂量复方或氯沙坦 50mg 加氨氯地平 5mg。每组各有 66 名患者完成了研究,其中每组各有 43 名患者对起始剂量有应答。治疗 4 周后,两种治疗均显著降低 SBP 和 DBP (p<0.001),且 SBP 平均降低(p=0.304)、DBP 平均降低(p=0.630)和应答率(p=1.0)相当。同样,两种升级治疗在第 12 周时 SBP 平均降低(p=0.484)、DBP 平均降低(p=0.650)和应答率(p=0.134)方面也相当。两种治疗在研究人群中均耐受良好。
美托洛尔控释片/氨氯地平固定剂量复方与氯沙坦加氨氯地平治疗原发性高血压同样有效且耐受良好。