Cardiology Division, Yonsei University Medical College, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Ther. 2011 Dec;33(12):1953-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.11.007. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
The number of hypertensive patients achieving treatment targets is not ideal with therapies that engage a single mechanism of action, and combination therapies using different mechanisms of action can increase drug efficacy in a synergistic way.
This noninferiority study compared the clinical efficacy and safety profile of fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg and amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy in essential hypertensive patients who respond poorly to amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy.
This was a double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial of hypertensive patients (N = 185) aged ≥18 years taking amlodipine 5 mg during the run-in treatment period but failed to achieve sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mm Hg. After randomization into the amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg fixed-dose combination group (n = 92) and the amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy group (n = 93), treatment was maintained without dose escalation for 8 weeks. The noninferiority margin was prespecified as 4 mm Hg after 8 weeks of treatment for the difference of the average change in DBP between treatments. The primary efficacy evaluation of noninferiority was tested using a confidence interval approach with a 97.5% 1-sided lower confidence limit using the average difference in DBP measured at baseline and 8 weeks.
After 8 weeks, the DBP of both groups decreased from baseline by 8.9 (6.1) and 9.4 (7.5) mm Hg, respectively (difference = -0.5 [6.9] mm Hg, 95% CI: -2.5 to 1.5). Secondary end points of reductions in DBP after 4 weeks (-8.1 [6.7] vs -9.9 [7.3] mm Hg, difference = -1.8 mm Hg, 95% CI: -3.9 to 0.2) and sitting systolic blood pressure after 4 (-10.2 [11.8] vs -12.8 [10.2] mm Hg, difference = -2.6 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.9 to 0.6) and 8 weeks (-12.2 [11.0] vs -13.4 [11.3] mm Hg, difference = -1.2 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.4 to 2.1) were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. There were 38 adverse events in 20 patients (21.7%) in the amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg fixed-dose combination group and 31 in 24 patients (26.1%) in the amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy group; most were mild. There were 7 adverse events in 6 patients (6.5%) related to treatment in the fixed-dose combination group and 13 in 10 patients (10.9%) in the monotherapy group (P = 0.30).
Fixed-dose combination amlodipine/losartan 5/50 mg was not inferior in terms of reductions in DBP after 8 weeks of treatment and had comparable safety profile to amlodipine 10 mg in patients who did not respond to amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00940667.
采用单一作用机制的治疗方法,高血压患者达到治疗目标的人数并不理想,而采用不同作用机制的联合治疗方法可以协同提高药物疗效。
本非劣效性研究比较了氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/50mg 固定剂量复方制剂与氨氯地平 10mg 单药治疗对氨氯地平 5mg 单药治疗反应不佳的原发性高血压患者的临床疗效和安全性。
这是一项双盲、多中心、随机试验,纳入了 185 名年龄≥18 岁的高血压患者(N=185),这些患者在导入治疗期间服用氨氯地平 5mg,但未能达到坐位舒张压(DBP)<90mmHg。随机分为氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/50mg 固定剂量复方组(n=92)和氨氯地平 10mg 单药组(n=93)后,不进行剂量调整,维持治疗 8 周。预设的非劣效性边界为治疗 8 周时两种治疗方法平均 DBP 差值的 4mmHg。采用置信区间方法,以 97.5%单侧置信下限对基线和 8 周时测量的 DBP 的平均差值进行非劣效性主要疗效评估。
治疗 8 周后,两组的 DBP 分别从基线下降了 8.9(6.1)和 9.4(7.5)mmHg(差值=-0.5[6.9]mmHg,95%CI:-2.5 至 1.5)。次要终点,4 周时 DBP 的降低(-8.1[6.7]vs.-9.9[7.3]mmHg,差值=-1.8mmHg,95%CI:-3.9 至 0.2)和 4 周、8 周时坐位收缩压的降低(-10.2[11.8]vs.-12.8[10.2]mmHg,差值=-2.6mmHg,95%CI:-5.9 至 0.6),两组间无显著差异。在氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/50mg 固定剂量复方组中,20 名患者(21.7%)出现 38 次不良事件,24 名患者(26.1%)在氨氯地平 10mg 单药组中出现 31 次不良事件;大多数为轻度不良事件。固定剂量复方组中有 6 名患者(6.5%)的 7 次不良事件与治疗相关,单药组中有 10 名患者(10.9%)的 13 次不良事件与治疗相关(P=0.30)。
在治疗 8 周后,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/50mg 固定剂量复方制剂在降低 DBP 方面不劣于氨氯地平 10mg,且在未接受氨氯地平 5mg 单药治疗的患者中,其安全性与氨氯地平 10mg 相当。临床试验注册号:NCT00940667。