Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中背静脉复合体缝合与钉合结扎的比较。

Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):385-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09146.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To present our operative and postoperative functional outcomes of sutured compared with endovascular staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex (DVC) during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Ligation of the DVC during RALP with an endovascular stapler has purported advantages of decreased apical positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, blood loss, and operative time when compared with suture ligation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 162 patients who underwent RALP between October 2005 and April 2008 by one surgeon (R.B.N.) were assessed. We retrospectively analysed two different treatment groups: group 1 underwent DVC ligation with a single suture, while group 2 underwent endovascular staple ligation.

RESULTS

Of the 162 patients evaluated, 67 had suture ligation (group 1) and 95 had staple ligation (group 2) of the DVC. Baseline patient characteristics (age, body mass index, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage) and tumour characteristics (specimen weight, tumour volume, pathological Gleason score and stage) did not differ between the groups. Estimated blood loss (494 mL vs 288 mL), time to dissect out, ligate and transect the DVC (30 min vs 24 min), apical PSM rate (13.4% vs 2.1%) differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 respectively, favouring staple ligation of the DVC. At 6 months follow-up, there was no difference between the groups for PSA recurrence (3.7% vs 0%), complete continence (63.4% vs 55.7%) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men score (8.4 vs 8.6).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, staple ligation of the DVC during RALP resulted in improved apical PSM rates, faster operative times and less blood loss.

摘要

目的

介绍我们在机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中(RALP)使用缝合与血管内钉合结扎背静脉复合体(DVC)的手术和术后功能结果。与缝合结扎相比,RALP 中使用血管内吻合器结扎 DVC 据称具有降低尖部阳性手术切缘(PSM)率、减少出血量和缩短手术时间的优势。

患者和方法

总共评估了 162 名于 2005 年 10 月至 2008 年 4 月间由同一位外科医生(R.B.N.)行 RALP 的患者。我们回顾性分析了两组不同的治疗方法:第 1 组采用单根缝线结扎 DVC,而第 2 组采用血管内钉合结扎。

结果

在评估的 162 名患者中,67 名患者接受了缝线结扎(第 1 组),95 名患者接受了钉合结扎(第 2 组)。两组患者的基线特征(年龄、体重指数、前列腺活检 Gleason 评分、临床分期)和肿瘤特征(标本重量、肿瘤体积、病理 Gleason 评分和分期)无差异。两组之间估计出血量(494ml 与 288ml)、分离、结扎和切断 DVC 的时间(30 分钟与 24 分钟)、尖部 PSM 率(13.4%与 2.1%)存在显著差异,这均有利于 DVC 的钉合结扎。在 6 个月的随访中,两组之间在 PSA 复发率(3.7%与 0%)、完全控尿率(63.4%与 55.7%)和男性健康状况调查量表评分(8.4 与 8.6)方面无差异。

结论

在本研究中,RALP 中 DVC 的钉合结扎可提高尖部 PSM 率、缩短手术时间和减少出血量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验