Woldu Solomon L, Patel Trushar, Shapiro Edan Y, Bergman Ari M, Badani Ketan K
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Can J Urol. 2013 Dec;20(6):7079-83.
There are many concerns expressed by urologists performed robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) regarding management of the dorsal vein complex (DVC). We sought to examine the influence of delayed DVC ligation versus standard DVC ligation on the apical surgical margin status and other key surgical parameters following RALP.
The Columbia University Urologic Oncology Database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent RALP between 2008-2011. Operative records were analyzed to determine whether the DVC was ligated in the 'standard' or 'delayed' manner. The standard group had the DVC ligated prior to the apical dissection; in the delayed group, the DVC was initially transected and subsequently oversewn after completion of the apical dissection. Clinical and pathologic data was retrospectively evaluated and stratified by the type of DVC ligation to compare positive apical margin rates based on DVC-control technique.
A total of 244 patients were identified, including 118 in the standard group and 126 in the delayed group. Estimated blood loss (112 mL versus 122 mL), operative time (132 min versus 126 min), and postoperative continence rates (81% versus 84% at 3 months) were similar between the standard and delayed DVC groups (p = NS). Apical margin status was also similar in the two groups, with 3.4% having a positive surgical margin in the standard DVC ligation arm, and 1.6% having a positive margin in the delayed DVC ligation arm (p = 0.43).
Delayed DVC ligation after apical dissection is a safe approach with comparable surgical outcomes during RALP. From a technical standpoint, we feel it allows for improved visualization of the apical dissection and therefore has become standard practice at our institution.
实施机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)的泌尿外科医生对背静脉复合体(DVC)的处理存在诸多担忧。我们试图研究延迟结扎DVC与标准结扎DVC对RALP术后尖部手术切缘状态及其他关键手术参数的影响。
回顾性分析哥伦比亚大学泌尿外科肿瘤数据库,以确定2008年至2011年间接受RALP的患者。分析手术记录,确定DVC是以“标准”还是“延迟”方式结扎。标准组在尖部解剖前结扎DVC;延迟组最初横断DVC,在尖部解剖完成后再进行缝合。回顾性评估临床和病理数据,并根据DVC结扎类型进行分层,以比较基于DVC控制技术的阳性尖部切缘率。
共确定244例患者,其中标准组118例,延迟组126例。标准DVC组和延迟DVC组之间的估计失血量(112 mL对122 mL)、手术时间(132分钟对126分钟)和术后3个月的控尿率(81%对84%)相似(p = 无显著性差异)。两组的尖部切缘状态也相似,标准DVC结扎组3.4%的患者手术切缘阳性,延迟DVC结扎组1.6%的患者切缘阳性(p = 0.43)。
在RALP中,尖部解剖后延迟结扎DVC是一种安全的方法,手术结果相当。从技术角度来看,我们认为它能改善尖部解剖的视野,因此已成为我们机构的标准做法。