Suppr超能文献

美国生物医学研究经费,2003-2008 年。

Funding of US biomedical research, 2003-2008.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):137-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1987.

Abstract

CONTEXT

With the exception of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, funding support for biomedical research in the United States has slowed after a decade of doubling. However, the extent and scope of slowing are largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify funding of biomedical research in the United States from 2003 to 2008.

DESIGN

Publicly available data were used to quantify funding from government (federal, state, and local), private, and industry sources. Regression models were used to compare financial trends between 1994-2003 and 2003-2007. The numbers of new drug and device approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration over the same period were also evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Funding and growth rates by source; numbers of US Food and Drug Administration approvals.

RESULTS

Biomedical research funding increased from $75.5 billion in 2003 to $101.1 billion in 2007. In 2008, funding from the National Institutes of Health and industry totaled $88.8 billion. In 2007, funding from these sources, adjusted for inflation, was $90.2 billion. Adjusted for inflation, funding from 2003 to 2007 increased by 14%, for a compound annual growth rate of 3.4%. By comparison, funding from 1994 to 2003 increased at an annual rate of 7.8% (P < .001). In 2007, industry (58%) was the largest funder, followed by the federal government (33%). Modest increase in funding was not accompanied by an increase in approvals for drugs or devices. In 2007, the United States spent an estimated 4.5% of its total health expenditures on biomedical research and 0.1% on health services research.

CONCLUSION

After a decade of doubling, the rate of increase in biomedical research funding slowed from 2003 to 2007, and after adjustment for inflation, the absolute level of funding from the National Institutes of Health and industry appears to have decreased by 2% in 2008.

摘要

背景

除了美国复苏与再投资法案外,美国的生物医学研究资金支持在经历了十年的翻番后有所放缓。然而,资金放缓的程度和范围在很大程度上是未知的。

目的

量化 2003 年至 2008 年美国生物医学研究的资金情况。

设计

利用公开数据来量化来自政府(联邦、州和地方)、私人和工业来源的资金。回归模型用于比较 1994-2003 年和 2003-2007 年的财务趋势。同期美国食品和药物管理局批准的新药和新器械数量也进行了评估。

主要观察指标

按来源划分的资金和增长率;美国食品和药物管理局批准的数量。

结果

2003 年至 2007 年,生物医学研究资金从 755 亿美元增加到 1011 亿美元。2008 年,国立卫生研究院和工业界的资金总计 888 亿美元。按通胀调整后,2007 年这些来源的资金为 902 亿美元。按通胀调整后,2003 年至 2007 年的资金增长了 14%,复合年增长率为 3.4%。相比之下,1994 年至 2003 年的资金增长速度为每年 7.8%(P<0.001)。2007 年,工业界(58%)是最大的资金来源,其次是联邦政府(33%)。资金的适度增长并没有伴随着药物或器械批准数量的增加。2007 年,美国在生物医学研究上的支出约占其总卫生支出的 4.5%,在卫生服务研究上的支出占 0.1%。

结论

在经历了十年的翻番后,2003 年至 2007 年生物医学研究资金的增长速度放缓,按通胀调整后,2008 年国立卫生研究院和工业界的资金绝对水平似乎下降了 2%。

相似文献

1
Funding of US biomedical research, 2003-2008.
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):137-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1987.
2
The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons.
JAMA. 2015 Jan 13;313(2):174-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15939.
3
Insights from trends in biomedical research funding.
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):170-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1992.
4
Financial anatomy of neuroscience research.
Ann Neurol. 2006 Dec;60(6):652-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.21047.
5
Financing of U.S. biomedical research and new drug approvals across therapeutic areas.
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 11;4(9):e7015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007015.
6
A plan for sustainable funding for US biomedical research.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Feb;14(2):147. doi: 10.1038/nrd4454-c1.
7
The future of research funding in academic medicine.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1482-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0900132.
8
Financial anatomy of biomedical research.
JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1333-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1333.
9
Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
J Pain. 2008 Dec;9(12):1074-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.001.
10
The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 20;354(16):1665-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068050.

引用本文的文献

1
Globalisation of industry-sponsored clinical trials for breast, lung and colon cancer research: trends, threats and opportunities.
BMJ Oncol. 2023 Sep 30;2(1):e000101. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000101. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychedelics in PERIL: The Commercial Determinants of Health, Financial Entanglements and Population Health Ethics.
Public Health Ethics. 2024 Mar 1;17(1-2):24-39. doi: 10.1093/phe/phae002. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jul.
3
Precision medicine in AML: overcoming resistance.
Int J Hematol. 2024 Oct;120(4):439-454. doi: 10.1007/s12185-024-03827-8. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
4
The landscape of biomedical research funding in Brazil: a current overview.
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Mar-Apr;50(2):209-222. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9905.
5
Inflation-adjusted medicare physician reimbursement for adult spinal deformity surgery substantially declined from 2002 to 2020.
Spine Deform. 2024 Mar;12(2):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00779-7. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
Has pharmaceutical innovation reduced the average cost of U.S. health care episodes?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2024 Mar;24(1):1-31. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09363-y. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
8
Experimental Neurotherapeutics: Surfing the Tidal Wave of New Opportunities.
Ann Neurol. 2023 Mar;93(3):427-430. doi: 10.1002/ana.26582. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
10

本文引用的文献

1
'Marginal medicine': targeting comparative effectiveness research to reduce waste.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jul-Aug;28(4):w710-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w710. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
2
Drugs, industry, and academia.
Science. 2008 Jun 20;320(5883):1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1161006.
3
Translational research: crossing the valley of death.
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):840-2. doi: 10.1038/453840a.
4
A delicate balance.
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):838. doi: 10.1038/453838a.
5
Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w572-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w572. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech.
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Oct;84(10):114-24, 150.
7
A proposal for radical changes in the drug-approval process.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 10;355(6):618-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb055203.
8
Case histories, magic bullets and the state of drug discovery.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006 Aug;5(8):635-40. doi: 10.1038/nrd2084. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
9
Financial anatomy of biomedical research.
JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1333-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1333.
10
It's the prices, stupid: why the United States is so different from other countries.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May-Jun;22(3):89-105. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.89.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验