• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国生物医学研究经费,2003-2008 年。

Funding of US biomedical research, 2003-2008.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):137-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1987.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2009.1987
PMID:20068207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3118092/
Abstract

CONTEXT

With the exception of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, funding support for biomedical research in the United States has slowed after a decade of doubling. However, the extent and scope of slowing are largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify funding of biomedical research in the United States from 2003 to 2008.

DESIGN

Publicly available data were used to quantify funding from government (federal, state, and local), private, and industry sources. Regression models were used to compare financial trends between 1994-2003 and 2003-2007. The numbers of new drug and device approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration over the same period were also evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Funding and growth rates by source; numbers of US Food and Drug Administration approvals.

RESULTS

Biomedical research funding increased from $75.5 billion in 2003 to $101.1 billion in 2007. In 2008, funding from the National Institutes of Health and industry totaled $88.8 billion. In 2007, funding from these sources, adjusted for inflation, was $90.2 billion. Adjusted for inflation, funding from 2003 to 2007 increased by 14%, for a compound annual growth rate of 3.4%. By comparison, funding from 1994 to 2003 increased at an annual rate of 7.8% (P < .001). In 2007, industry (58%) was the largest funder, followed by the federal government (33%). Modest increase in funding was not accompanied by an increase in approvals for drugs or devices. In 2007, the United States spent an estimated 4.5% of its total health expenditures on biomedical research and 0.1% on health services research.

CONCLUSION

After a decade of doubling, the rate of increase in biomedical research funding slowed from 2003 to 2007, and after adjustment for inflation, the absolute level of funding from the National Institutes of Health and industry appears to have decreased by 2% in 2008.

摘要

背景

除了美国复苏与再投资法案外,美国的生物医学研究资金支持在经历了十年的翻番后有所放缓。然而,资金放缓的程度和范围在很大程度上是未知的。

目的

量化 2003 年至 2008 年美国生物医学研究的资金情况。

设计

利用公开数据来量化来自政府(联邦、州和地方)、私人和工业来源的资金。回归模型用于比较 1994-2003 年和 2003-2007 年的财务趋势。同期美国食品和药物管理局批准的新药和新器械数量也进行了评估。

主要观察指标

按来源划分的资金和增长率;美国食品和药物管理局批准的数量。

结果

2003 年至 2007 年,生物医学研究资金从 755 亿美元增加到 1011 亿美元。2008 年,国立卫生研究院和工业界的资金总计 888 亿美元。按通胀调整后,2007 年这些来源的资金为 902 亿美元。按通胀调整后,2003 年至 2007 年的资金增长了 14%,复合年增长率为 3.4%。相比之下,1994 年至 2003 年的资金增长速度为每年 7.8%(P<0.001)。2007 年,工业界(58%)是最大的资金来源,其次是联邦政府(33%)。资金的适度增长并没有伴随着药物或器械批准数量的增加。2007 年,美国在生物医学研究上的支出约占其总卫生支出的 4.5%,在卫生服务研究上的支出占 0.1%。

结论

在经历了十年的翻番后,2003 年至 2007 年生物医学研究资金的增长速度放缓,按通胀调整后,2008 年国立卫生研究院和工业界的资金绝对水平似乎下降了 2%。

相似文献

1
Funding of US biomedical research, 2003-2008.美国生物医学研究经费,2003-2008 年。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):137-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1987.
2
The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons.医学研究的剖析:美国与国际比较。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 13;313(2):174-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15939.
3
Insights from trends in biomedical research funding.生物医学研究资金趋势洞察。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 13;303(2):170-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1992.
4
Financial anatomy of neuroscience research.神经科学研究的经费剖析
Ann Neurol. 2006 Dec;60(6):652-9. doi: 10.1002/ana.21047.
5
Financing of U.S. biomedical research and new drug approvals across therapeutic areas.美国生物医学研究和各治疗领域新药批准的资金情况。
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 11;4(9):e7015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007015.
6
A plan for sustainable funding for US biomedical research.美国生物医学研究可持续资金计划。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Feb;14(2):147. doi: 10.1038/nrd4454-c1.
7
The future of research funding in academic medicine.学术医学研究资金的未来。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1482-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0900132.
8
Financial anatomy of biomedical research.生物医学研究的资金剖析
JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1333-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1333.
9
Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.应对美国国立卫生研究院疼痛研究资金的减少。
J Pain. 2008 Dec;9(12):1074-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.001.
10
The NIH budget and the future of biomedical research.美国国立卫生研究院的预算与生物医学研究的未来。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 20;354(16):1665-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068050.

引用本文的文献

1
Globalisation of industry-sponsored clinical trials for breast, lung and colon cancer research: trends, threats and opportunities.乳腺癌、肺癌和结肠癌研究的行业资助临床试验全球化:趋势、威胁与机遇。
BMJ Oncol. 2023 Sep 30;2(1):e000101. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000101. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychedelics in PERIL: The Commercial Determinants of Health, Financial Entanglements and Population Health Ethics.处于危险中的迷幻药:健康的商业决定因素、金融纠葛与人口健康伦理
Public Health Ethics. 2024 Mar 1;17(1-2):24-39. doi: 10.1093/phe/phae002. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jul.
3
Precision medicine in AML: overcoming resistance.

本文引用的文献

1
'Marginal medicine': targeting comparative effectiveness research to reduce waste.“边缘医学”:以比较实效研究为目标,减少浪费。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jul-Aug;28(4):w710-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w710. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
2
Drugs, industry, and academia.药物、产业与学术界。
Science. 2008 Jun 20;320(5883):1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1161006.
3
Translational research: crossing the valley of death.转化医学研究:跨越死亡谷。
精准医学治疗 AML:克服耐药性。
Int J Hematol. 2024 Oct;120(4):439-454. doi: 10.1007/s12185-024-03827-8. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
4
The landscape of biomedical research funding in Brazil: a current overview.巴西生物医学研究经费的全貌:当前概述。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Mar-Apr;50(2):209-222. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9905.
5
Inflation-adjusted medicare physician reimbursement for adult spinal deformity surgery substantially declined from 2002 to 2020.经通胀调整后,2002 年至 2020 年,成人脊柱畸形手术的医疗保险医师报销费用大幅下降。
Spine Deform. 2024 Mar;12(2):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00779-7. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
Has pharmaceutical innovation reduced the average cost of U.S. health care episodes?医药创新是否降低了美国医疗保健事件的平均成本?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2024 Mar;24(1):1-31. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09363-y. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
7
Using early health economic modeling to inform medical innovation development: a soft robotic sock in poststroke patients in Singapore.利用早期健康经济模型为医疗创新研发提供信息:新加坡脑卒中患者的一款软机器人袜子。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jan 11;39(1):e4. doi: 10.1017/S026646232200335X.
8
Experimental Neurotherapeutics: Surfing the Tidal Wave of New Opportunities.实验神经治疗学:新机遇的浪潮中冲浪。
Ann Neurol. 2023 Mar;93(3):427-430. doi: 10.1002/ana.26582. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
9
20-year Inflation-Adjusted Medicare Reimbursements (Years: 2000-2020) For Common Lumbar and Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Procedures.20年经通胀调整的医疗保险报销情况(年份:2000 - 2020年),针对常见的腰椎和颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病手术。
Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):211-218. doi: 10.1177/21925682221100173. Epub 2022 May 24.
10
Using health technology assessment to set priority, inform target product profiles, and design clinical study for health innovation.利用卫生技术评估来确定优先事项、为目标产品简介提供信息,并为卫生创新设计临床研究。
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Nov;172:121000. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121000.
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):840-2. doi: 10.1038/453840a.
4
A delicate balance.一种微妙的平衡。
Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):838. doi: 10.1038/453838a.
5
Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information.建立一个比较效果信息中心。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w572-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w572. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech.科学能成为一门生意吗?来自生物技术领域的经验教训。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Oct;84(10):114-24, 150.
7
A proposal for radical changes in the drug-approval process.一项关于药物审批流程彻底变革的提议。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 10;355(6):618-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb055203.
8
Case histories, magic bullets and the state of drug discovery.病例史、神奇药物与药物研发现状
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006 Aug;5(8):635-40. doi: 10.1038/nrd2084. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
9
Financial anatomy of biomedical research.生物医学研究的资金剖析
JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1333-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1333.
10
It's the prices, stupid: why the United States is so different from other countries.关键在于价格,笨蛋:美国为何与其他国家如此不同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 May-Jun;22(3):89-105. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.3.89.