Wilensky Gail R
Project HOPE in Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w572-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w572. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
Interest in objective, credible comparative clinical effectiveness information has been growing in the United States, both by those who support competitive behavior in health care and by those who support administered pricing. The Medicare drug benefit has heightened interest in better information, although the potential payoff is even greater for medical procedures than for drugs, since procedures account for more of the health care dollar. Careful consideration needs to be given regarding the appropriate structure, placement, financing, and function of an agency devoted to comparative effectiveness if it is to achieve its objective: a mechanism to support better decision making in health care.
在美国,无论是支持医疗保健领域竞争行为的人,还是支持统一定价的人,对客观、可信的比较临床疗效信息的兴趣都在不断增长。医疗保险药品福利计划提高了人们对更好信息的兴趣,不过对于医疗程序而言,潜在回报比药品更大,因为医疗程序在医疗保健费用中占比更高。如果一个致力于比较疗效的机构要实现其目标,即建立一种支持医疗保健领域更好决策的机制,就需要仔细考虑其适当的结构、定位、资金来源和职能。