Bottlang Michael, Helzel Inga, Long William, Fitzpatrick Daniel, Madey Steven
Biomechanics Laboratory, Legacy Research and Technology Center, Portland, Oregon 97232, USA.
J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1218-24. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bb9df1.
This study evaluated intramedullary fixation of rib fractures with Kirschner wires and novel ribs splints. We hypothesized that rib splints can provide equivalent fixation strength while avoiding complications associated with Kirschner wires, namely wire migration and cutout.
The durability, strength, and failure modes of rib fracture fixation with Kirschner wires and rib splints were evaluated in 22 paired human ribs. First, intact ribs were loaded to failure to determine their strength. After fracture fixation with Kirschner wires and rib splints, fixation constructs were dynamically loaded to 360,000 cycles at five times the respiratory load to determine their durability. Finally, constructs were loaded to failure to determine residual strength and failure modes.
All constructs sustained dynamic loading without failure. Dynamic loading caused three times more subsidence in Kirschner wire constructs (1.2 mm +/- 1.4 mm) than in rib splint constructs (0.4 mm +/- 0.2 mm, p = 0.09). After dynamic loading, rib splint constructs remained 48% stronger than Kirschner wire constructs (p = 0.001). Five of 11 Kirschner wire constructs failed catastrophically by cutting through the medial cortex, leading to complete loss of stability and wire migration through the lateral cortex. The remaining six constructs failed by wire bending. Rib splint constructs failed by development of fracture lines along the superior and interior cortices. No splint construct failed catastrophically, and all splint constructs retained functional reduction and fixation.
Because of their superior strength and absence of catastrophic failure mode, rib splints can serve as an attractive alternative to Kirschner wires for intramedullary stabilization of rib fractures, especially in the case of posterior rib fractures where access for plating is limited.
本研究评估了克氏针和新型肋骨夹板对肋骨骨折的髓内固定效果。我们假设肋骨夹板能提供同等的固定强度,同时避免与克氏针相关的并发症,即克氏针移位和穿出。
在22对人肋骨上评估克氏针和肋骨夹板对肋骨骨折固定的耐久性、强度及失效模式。首先,对完整肋骨加载直至破坏以确定其强度。在用克氏针和肋骨夹板固定骨折后,将固定结构以呼吸负荷的五倍动态加载360,000次循环以确定其耐久性。最后,对结构加载直至破坏以确定残余强度和失效模式。
所有结构均承受动态加载而未失效。动态加载导致克氏针固定结构的下沉量(1.2毫米±1.4毫米)是肋骨夹板固定结构(0.4毫米±0.2毫米,p = 0.09)的三倍。动态加载后,肋骨夹板固定结构的强度比克氏针固定结构高48%(p = 0.001)。11个克氏针固定结构中有5个因穿透内侧皮质而灾难性失效,导致稳定性完全丧失且克氏针穿过外侧皮质移位。其余6个结构因克氏针弯曲而失效。肋骨夹板固定结构因沿上、内皮质出现骨折线而失效。没有夹板结构灾难性失效,且所有夹板结构均保持功能复位和固定。
由于其 superior strength 和不存在灾难性失效模式,肋骨夹板可作为克氏针用于肋骨骨折髓内稳定的有吸引力的替代方法,尤其是在后路肋骨骨折且钢板置入受限的情况下。 (注:superior strength 此处未准确翻译,结合语境可能是“更高的强度”等意思,需根据专业知识进一步确定)