Mattel Children's Hospital at UCLA, UCLA Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;11(2):275-81. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181cead7f.
To compare the efficiency of a stopcock system and a newly designed device to titrate low-flow infusions to critically ill infants.
In vitro study comparing fluid delivery through readily available and custom-built equipment.
Engineering laboratory of a university-affiliated hospital.
PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: None.
Two infusion pumps were used to deliver five 0.1-mL/hr infusions and an 8-mL/hr carrier through a conventional stopcock system. A diluted dye was used to quantize the amount of any given infusion reaching the patient. Samples were collected over a 90-min period and analyzed by spectophotometry. Thirty minutes into each trial, the red dye infusion rate was doubled. A multiple infusion connector was manufactured and tested in place of the stopcock system. Without a stopcock system or multiple infusion connector, both an infusion and a syringe pump were tested for accuracy of delivery of 0.1 mL/hr and 0.2 mL/hr of dye infusions.
The infusion pump was more accurate than a 60-mL syringe pump in generating infusion rates of both 0.1 mL/hr and 0.2 mL/hr. When delivering a 0.1-mL/hr dye infusion through the distal port of an array of six stopcocks, the actual delivery of a diluted red dye infusion took approximately 32 mins to double after being increased from 0.1 mL/hr to 0.2 mL/hr. When using the multiple infusion connector to connect the low-volume drips together, the same change in flow rate caused the actual delivery of dye to double in <8 mins (a result comparable to the data from the proximal port of a stopcock). This result was independent of which port was used for dye delivery. Streaming of the red dye within the stopcock system was observed.
When using the conventional stopcock array to titrate low-rate infusions, significant delays were observed. A device designed specifically for infusions in infants may substantially improve this system.
比较一种旋塞系统和一种新设计的设备在给危重新生儿滴定低流速输液时的效率。
比较通过现成的和定制的设备输送液体的体外研究。
大学附属医院的工程实验室。
患者/受试者:无。
使用两台输液泵通过传统的旋塞系统输送五份 0.1 毫升/小时的输液和一份 8 毫升/小时的载体。用稀释的染料来量化到达患者的任何给定输液量。在 90 分钟的时间内采集样本并通过分光光度法进行分析。在每次试验进行到 30 分钟时,红色染料的输注率增加一倍。制造并测试了一种多输液连接器以替代旋塞系统。在没有旋塞系统或多输液连接器的情况下,都测试了输液泵和注射器泵以准确输送 0.1 毫升/小时和 0.2 毫升/小时的染料输液。
输液泵比 60 毫升注射器泵更准确地产生 0.1 毫升/小时和 0.2 毫升/小时的输液率。当通过六个旋塞的远端端口输送 0.1 毫升/小时的染料输液时,将稀释的红色染料输液的流速从 0.1 毫升/小时增加到 0.2 毫升/小时后,实际输送时间大约需要 32 分钟才能翻倍。当使用多输液连接器将低容量滴注连接在一起时,相同的流速变化导致染料的实际输送在<8 分钟内翻倍(与旋塞近端端口的数据结果相当)。这一结果与用于输送染料的端口无关。在旋塞系统内观察到红色染料的流动。
当使用传统的旋塞阵列滴定低速率输液时,观察到明显的延迟。专门为婴儿输液设计的设备可能会显著改善该系统。