Tarantini Giuseppe, Napodano Massimo, Gasparetto Nicola, Favaretto Enrico, Marra Martina Perazzolo, Cacciavillani Luisa, Bilato Claudio, Osto Elena, Cademartiri Filippo, Musumeci Giuseppe, Corbetti Francesco, Razzolini Renato, Iliceto Sabino
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Mar;21(2):78-86. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328335a074.
The mechanism through which multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) adversely affects the outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is poorly characterized. We assessed whether the impact of MVD on outcome of STEMI patients is because of ischemic damage after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or to late ischemic events.
From August 2005 to 2007, 288 STEMI patients treated by (bare metal) stent-PPCI were prospectively enrolled. The ischemic injury early after PPCI (evaluated by multiparametric approach) and the incidence of late adverse cardiovascular events were compared between the two groups.
Compared with single vessel coronary artery disease, MVD patients (n=134) were older, with higher prevalence of diabetes, prior MI, anterior MI and higher collateral score. Myocardial perfusion as assessed by myocardial blush and SigmaST-segment resolution was similar in the two groups as well as the infarct size and microvascular obstruction as assessed by Troponin I and by the delayed enhancement of cardiac magnetic resonance. At clinical (98% complete) and echocardiogaphic (94% complete) follow-up (median 32 months) MVD patients showed a higher incidence of re-MI (6.1 vs. 1.3%), and urgent revascularization (8.3 vs. 2.7%) and worse left ventricular remodeling than single vessel disease patients. At propensity adjusted analysis MVD was an independent predictor of re-MI (odds ratio: 5.7) and ventricular remodeling (odds ratio: 2.2).
The impact of MVD on clinical outcome and remodeling of STEMI patients is not because of the extent of ischemic damage observed after PPCI, but to recurrent ischemic events during follow-up.
多支冠状动脉疾病(MVD)对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者预后产生不利影响的机制目前尚不清楚。我们评估了MVD对STEMI患者预后的影响是由于初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)后的缺血损伤还是晚期缺血事件。
2005年8月至2007年,前瞻性纳入288例接受(裸金属)支架PPCI治疗的STEMI患者。比较两组患者PPCI后早期的缺血损伤(采用多参数方法评估)和晚期不良心血管事件的发生率。
与单支冠状动脉疾病患者相比,MVD患者(n = 134)年龄更大,糖尿病、既往心肌梗死、前壁心肌梗死的患病率更高,侧支循环评分更高。通过心肌 blush和SigmaST段分辨率评估的心肌灌注在两组中相似,通过肌钙蛋白I和心脏磁共振延迟强化评估的梗死面积和微血管阻塞情况也相似。在临床(98%完成)和超声心动图(94%完成)随访(中位时间32个月)时,MVD患者再发心肌梗死(6.1%对1.3%)、紧急血运重建(8.3%对2.7%)的发生率更高,左心室重构比单支血管疾病患者更差。在倾向调整分析中,MVD是再发心肌梗死(优势比:5.7)和心室重构(优势比:2.2)的独立预测因素。
MVD对STEMI患者临床结局和重构的影响不是由于PPCI后观察到的缺血损伤程度,而是由于随访期间反复发生的缺血事件。