Suppr超能文献

不同年龄和种族女性腰椎屈伸活动度的研究:WIN 研究。

Lumbar spine flexion and extension extremes of motion in women of different age and racial groups: the WIN Study.

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jul 15;35(16):1539-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0c3d1.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Observational.

OBJECTIVE

To provide normative values of lumbar flexion and extension for women of different age and racial groups.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal range of motion (ROM) is one of the AMA Guides criteria used to estimate level of impairment and subsequent compensation entitlement. Studies show that spinal ROM varies with age, gender, and possibly race/ethnicity, but adequate normative values for different age and racial/ethnic groups do not exist.

METHODS

A cohort of free-living women was recruited for the Women's Injury Study at The Cooper Institute in Dallas. Originally, 917 women between the ages of 20 and 83 (M = 52 +/- 13) underwent an orthopedic examination including lumbar spine flexion and extension measurement using an electronic inclinometer. Measurements were taken in the fully extended and flexed positions, respectively. This removes the influence of initial resting posture and is termed "extreme of motion" (EOM) as opposed to ROM. Age and racial groups were compared using a 2-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) followed with post hoc tests.

RESULTS

Means (+/-SD) were calculated for racial (white, N = 619, African-American, N = 147) and age groups (young, 20-39 years, n = 126; middle, 40-59 years, n = 412; older, > or = 60 years, n = 228). Lumbar extension for African-American women (60.1 degrees) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than for white women (52.6 degrees), but flexion was not different (15.2 degrees and 17.0 degrees), respectively. Extension EOM for the young group (61.6 degrees) was greater (P < 0.05) than the middle (56.6 degrees) and older (50.8 degrees) groups. Extension difference between the middle and older groups was significant. Flexion EOM for the young group (20.1 degrees) was greater (P < 0.05) than the middle (15.2 degrees) and older (12.8 degrees) groups. The difference in flexion between the middle and older groups was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Normative values of lumbar extension are different for white and African-American women. Values for lumbar flexion and extension are different between age groups. Different criteria should be used to estimate impairment level in women of different racial and age groups.

摘要

研究设计

观察性研究。

目的

为不同年龄和种族群体的女性提供腰椎屈伸的正常值。

背景数据概要

脊柱活动范围(ROM)是 AMA 指南标准之一,用于估计损伤程度和随后的赔偿权益。研究表明,脊柱 ROM 随年龄、性别而变化,可能也与种族/民族有关,但不同年龄和种族/民族群体的充分正常值尚不存在。

方法

在达拉斯库珀研究所的妇女伤害研究中,招募了一组自由生活的女性。最初,917 名年龄在 20 至 83 岁之间的女性(M = 52 +/- 13)接受了骨科检查,包括使用电子测斜仪测量腰椎屈伸。分别在完全伸展和弯曲位置进行测量。这消除了初始静息姿势的影响,被称为“运动极限”(EOM),与 ROM 相反。使用 2 因素多元方差分析(MANOVA)比较年龄和种族组,然后进行事后检验。

结果

计算了种族(白人,N = 619,非裔美国人,N = 147)和年龄组(年轻,20-39 岁,n = 126;中年,40-59 岁,n = 412;老年,≥60 岁,n = 228)的平均值(+/-SD)。非裔美国女性的腰椎伸展度(60.1 度)明显大于(P < 0.05)白人女性(52.6 度),但弯曲度没有差异(分别为 15.2 度和 17.0 度)。年轻组的 EOM 伸展度(61.6 度)大于中年组(56.6 度)和老年组(50.8 度)。中年和老年组之间的伸展差异显著。年轻组的 EOM 弯曲度(20.1 度)大于中年组(15.2 度)和老年组(12.8 度)。中年和老年组之间的弯曲差异不显著。

结论

白人女性和非裔美国女性的腰椎伸展正常值不同。不同年龄组的腰椎屈伸正常值不同。不同种族和年龄组的女性应使用不同的标准来估计损伤程度。

相似文献

1
Lumbar spine flexion and extension extremes of motion in women of different age and racial groups: the WIN Study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jul 15;35(16):1539-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0c3d1.
3
Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):106-12. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181981823.
4
Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1435-46. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067085.46840.5A.
5
Sacroiliac joint motion in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):209-16. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14590. Epub 2015 May 15.
6
Lumbar spine side bending is reduced in end range extension compared to neutral and end range flexion postures.
Man Ther. 2014 Apr;19(2):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Spinal Fusion Is Associated With Changes in Acetabular Orientation and Reductions in Pelvic Mobility.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):324-330. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000390.
8
Do flexion/extension postures affect the in vivo passive lumbar spine response to applied axial twist moments?
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Jun;23(5):510-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
9
Lumbar Spine Alignment in Six Common Postures: An ROM Analysis With Implications for Deformity Correction.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Oct 1;42(19):1447-1455. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002131.
10
Comparative evaluation of a novel measurement tool to assess lumbar spine posture and range of motion.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Nov;21(11):2170-80. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2312-1. Epub 2012 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

2
Response to: Clinical Implication of Mid-Range Dynamic Instability in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):766-767. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0412.r2. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
Letter to the Editor: Clinical Implication of Mid-Range Dynamic Instability in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):764-765. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0412.r1. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Whole-body patterns of the range of joint motion in young adults: masculine type and feminine type.
J Physiol Anthropol. 2016 Oct 1;35(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40101-016-0112-8.
5
Age-related loss of lumbar spinal lordosis and mobility--a study of 323 asymptomatic volunteers.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116186. eCollection 2014.
6
Musculoskeletal risk factors as predictors of injury in community-dwelling women.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Sep;46(9):1752-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000295.

本文引用的文献

1
Heritability of lumbar flexibility and the role of disc degeneration and body weight.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Feb;104(2):379-85. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01009.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
2
Differences in measurements of lumbar curvature related to gender and low back pain.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Sep;34(9):524-34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.9.524.
3
The influence of initial resting posture on range of motion of the lumbar spine.
Man Ther. 2001 Aug;6(3):139-44. doi: 10.1054/math.2001.0397.
4
A new, comprehensive normative database of lumbar spine ranges of motion.
Clin Rehabil. 2001 Aug;15(4):371-9. doi: 10.1191/026921501678310171.
5
Three-dimensional lumbar spinal kinematics: a study of range of movement in 100 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60+ years.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Dec;39(12):1337-40. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.12.1337.
7
Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the normal population.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Nov 15;20(22):2421-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199511001-00009.
8
The influence of age and gender on lumbar spine sagittal plane range of motion. A study of 1126 healthy subjects.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Mar 15;19(6):682-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199403001-00007.
9
An elemental resource for the human-task interface.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Spring;11(2):153-73. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300006802.
10
Normal motion of the lumbar spine as related to age and gender.
Eur Spine J. 1995;4(1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00298413.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验