Cardiac valve replacement in patients with end-stage renal failure: impact of prosthesis type on the early postoperative course.

BACKGROUND

It is still unclear whether biological or mechanical valves should be preferred in patients on chronic dialysis therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 104 patients (66.5 +/- 8.6 years) with end-stage renal failure (RF) who underwent aortic or mitral valve replacement between 2002 and 4/2008. Mechanical valves were implanted in 44 (42 %) patients and bioprostheses in 60 (58 %). The two groups were comparable with regard to preoperative data, age and incidence of additional CABG procedures. We studied in-hospital morbidity and mortality, major postoperative complications and length of ICU and hospital stay. Additionally, parameters predicting a poor outcome were analyzed with multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

The overall hospital mortality was 12.5 % and did not differ between the two groups (mechanical: 13.6 %, biological: 11.7 %, n. s.). In the postoperative course, duration of ventilation and ICU stay were similar, whereas hospital stay was significantly longer for patients with mechanical prostheses (19.5 +/- 5.4 vs. 15.6 +/- 4.1 days, P < 0.05). Mechanical valve patients had a significantly higher rate of postoperative cerebrovascular incidents (18.2 vs. 8.3 %, P < 0.05) and bleeding complications (15.9 vs. 11.7 %, P < 0.05). Reoperation, obesity, left ventricular ejection fraction < 30 % and previous neurological complications were independent predictors of hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that in patients with end-stage RF, the use of mechanical valves is associated with a significant risk of complications. Because of the poor overall survival of patients on dialysis, bioprosthesis degeneration will not be a limiting factor. Therefore, preference should be given to biological valves in these patients.