• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“学习曲线”可能还不够:评估机器人根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学经验曲线。

"Learning curve" may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Arizona Urology Specialists, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2010 Mar;24(3):473-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0121.

DOI:10.1089/end.2009.0121
PMID:20073553
Abstract

The use of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is widespread in the community. A definitive RALP "learning curve" has not been defined and existing learning curves do not account for urologists without prior advanced laparoscopic skills. Therefore, an easily evaluable metric, the "oncological experience curve," would be clinically useful to all urologists performing RALP. Positive surgical margin (PSM) status for all subjects undergoing RALP during the first 4 years of a single surgeon's experience was assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses and logistic regression identified predictors of PSM creation and their correlation with surgeon case volume. The oncological experience curve was defined as the case point at which only pT2 stage, not surgeon volume (and thus surgeon inexperience), predicted PSM in the logistic regression. A total of 469 consecutive subjects comprised our cohort. Overall pT2 and pT3 PSM rates were 20% and 40%, respectively. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen, pathologic stage, and year of surgery were associated with PSM occurrence. Pathologic stage exclusively correlated to PSM in pT2 specimens for the first time during the fourth year, after 290 subjects had been treated. pT2 PSM rate before and after Case 290 was 25% and 10%, respectively (p < 0.001). The oncological experience curve is a clinically meaningful measure to evaluate the RALP learning curve for non-fellowship-trained urologists. The oncological experience curve may be much longer than the previously reported learning curves. Surgeons should consider whether they can build enough experience to minimize suboptimal oncological outcomes before embarking on or continuing a RALP program.

摘要

机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术(RALP)在临床上得到了广泛应用。目前尚未确定明确的 RALP“学习曲线”,并且现有的学习曲线并未考虑到没有先前先进腹腔镜技能的泌尿科医生。因此,对于所有进行 RALP 的泌尿科医生来说,一种易于评估的指标,即“肿瘤学经验曲线”,将具有临床实用价值。评估了在一名外科医生经验的前 4 年内接受 RALP 的所有患者的阳性切缘(PSM)状态。单变量和多变量分析以及逻辑回归确定了 PSM 形成的预测因素及其与外科医生手术量的相关性。肿瘤学经验曲线定义为只有 pT2 期而不是外科医生的手术量(因此外科医生经验不足)可以预测逻辑回归中 PSM 的病例点。总共 469 例连续患者组成了我们的队列。总体上 pT2 和 pT3 的 PSM 发生率分别为 20%和 40%。术前前列腺特异性抗原、病理分期和手术年份与 PSM 的发生有关。病理分期仅与第四年的第 290 例患者治疗后的前 290 例患者的 pT2 标本中的 PSM 相关。在第 290 例患者之前和之后,pT2 PSM 发生率分别为 25%和 10%(p <0.001)。肿瘤学经验曲线是一种评估非 fellowship 培训泌尿科医生 RALP 学习曲线的有意义的指标。肿瘤学经验曲线可能比以前报道的学习曲线长得多。外科医生在开始或继续 RALP 项目之前,应考虑他们是否能够积累足够的经验,以最小化不理想的肿瘤学结果。

相似文献

1
"Learning curve" may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy.“学习曲线”可能还不够:评估机器人根治性前列腺切除术的肿瘤学经验曲线。
J Endourol. 2010 Mar;24(3):473-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0121.
2
Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.经验丰富的开放前列腺外科医生是否应该转为机器人手术?一位外科医生在 3 年内的真实学习曲线。
BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):378-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09158.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
3
Preliminary results of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) after fellowship training and experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). fellowship 培训及腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(LRP)经验后机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)的初步结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110 Suppl 4:64-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11479.x.
4
Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.通过长期的学习曲线,机器人根治性前列腺切除术可以实现更高的生活质量和更好的手术切缘:一项连续 1552 例的单外科医生前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):521-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.中等手术量机构中机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术的手术切缘阳性情况及早期肿瘤学结局
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):63-68. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02518-2. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.微创根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:肿瘤学结局的综合评估与累积求和分析
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):149.e1-149.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.015. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
7
Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的学习曲线:一项对3794例患者的多机构研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2011 Sep;63(3):191-8.
8
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放手术的比较:单刀医生的学习曲线比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1002-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0569. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
9
Incidence of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: Does the surgeon's experience have an influence on all pathological stages?机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘阳性的发生率:外科医生的经验是否对所有病理分期都有影响?
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Mar;38(2):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
10
The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.病例之间的休息日对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术围手术期结局的影响。
World J Urol. 2016 Feb;34(2):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1605-5. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the surgeon's learning curve impact pentafecta outcomes in radical prostatectomy? a systematic review and meta-analysis.外科医生的学习曲线是否会影响根治性前列腺切除术的五项完美指标结果?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 May 7;25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01810-x.
2
Learning Curves in Robotic Urological Oncological Surgery: Has Anything Changed During the Last Five Years?机器人泌尿外科肿瘤手术的学习曲线:过去五年有什么变化吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1334. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081334.
3
Analysis of Learning Curve in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed by a Surgeon.
一名外科医生实施机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线分析。
Adv Urol. 2020 May 26;2020:9191830. doi: 10.1155/2020/9191830. eCollection 2020.
4
A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.机器人手术学习曲线的系统评价:范围和异质性。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):353-365. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
5
Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的危险因素:单中心经验
BMC Urol. 2015 Apr 8;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0024-7.
6
Robotic-assisted prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy for locally-advanced prostate cancer: multi-institution comparison of oncologic outcomes.机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术与开放性经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术治疗局部进展期前列腺癌的多中心比较:肿瘤学结局。
Prostate Int. 2013;1(1):31-6. doi: 10.12954/PI.12001. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
7
Robotic radical prostatectomy at a teaching community hospital: outcomes and safety.教学社区医院的机器人根治性前列腺切除术:结果与安全性
JSLS. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):193-9. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985131930.
8
Surgery: Robotic prostatectomy proven to provide sexual outcome benefit.
Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Jul 8;8(7):357-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.91.