Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Misasagi, Yamashina, Japan.
Clin Chim Acta. 2010 Apr 2;411(7-8):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.12.026. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as indomethacin decrease mucosal PGE(2) content by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) activity and produce damage in the small intestine. The development of intestinal lesions induced by indomethacin was accompanied by increases in intestinal motility, enterobacterial invasion, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity, together with the up-regulation of COX-2 and iNOS mRNA expression. Neither SC-560, a selective COX-1 inhibitor, nor rofecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, alone caused intestinal damage, but their combined administration provoked lesions in the small intestine. SC-560, but not rofecoxib, caused intestinal hypermotility, bacterial invasion and the expression of COX-2 as well as iNOS mRNA, yet the iNOS and MPO activity was increased only when rofecoxib was administered together with SC-560. Although SC-560 inhibited PG production, the level of PGE(2) recovered in a rofecoxib-dependent manner. The intestinal hypermotility in response to indomethacin was prevented by both 16,16-dimethyl PGE(2) and atropine but not by ampicillin, yet all these agents inhibited not only the bacterial invasion but also the expression of COX-2 as well as the iNOS activity in the intestinal mucosa following indomethacin treatment, thereby preventing the intestinal damage. These results suggest that inhibition of COX-1, despite causing intestinal hypermotility, bacterial invasion and iNOS expression, up-regulates the expression of COX-2, and the PGE(2) derived from COX-2 counteracts the deleterious events caused by COX-1 inhibition and maintains mucosal integrity. These sequences of events explain why intestinal damage occurs when both COX-1 and COX-2 are inhibited.
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)如吲哚美辛通过抑制环氧化酶(COX)活性降低黏膜 PGE(2)含量,并在小肠中产生损伤。吲哚美辛诱导的肠道损伤伴随着肠道运动增加、肠杆菌入侵、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)和诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)活性增加,以及 COX-2 和 iNOS mRNA 表达上调。选择性 COX-1 抑制剂 SC-560 和选择性 COX-2 抑制剂罗非昔布单独使用均不会引起肠道损伤,但两者联合使用会引起小肠损伤。SC-560 但不是罗非昔布引起肠道高动力、细菌入侵和 COX-2 以及 iNOS mRNA 的表达,但只有当罗非昔布与 SC-560 一起给药时,iNOS 和 MPO 活性才会增加。尽管 SC-560 抑制 PG 产生,但 PGE(2)水平以罗非昔布依赖的方式恢复。16,16-二甲基 PGE(2)和阿托品均可预防吲哚美辛引起的肠道高动力,但氨苄西林不行,但所有这些药物不仅抑制了细菌入侵,还抑制了吲哚美辛治疗后肠道黏膜中 COX-2 和 iNOS 活性的表达,从而预防了肠道损伤。这些结果表明,尽管抑制 COX-1 会引起肠道高动力、细菌入侵和 iNOS 表达,但会上调 COX-2 的表达,而 COX-2 衍生的 PGE(2)会抵消 COX-1 抑制引起的有害事件并维持黏膜完整性。这些事件序列解释了为什么当同时抑制 COX-1 和 COX-2 时会发生肠道损伤。
Clin Chim Acta. 2010-1-13
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003-12
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005-7
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010-1-17
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002-4
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004-3
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023-4-28
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021-11-11
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020-12-23
Front Pharmacol. 2020-8-7
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019-11-13