Ghent University Hospital, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Belgium.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar 15;181(6):620-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1020OC. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
Soluble mesothelin (SM) is currently the reference serum biomarker of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF), which originates from the same precursor protein, is potentially more sensitive, yet lacks validation.
To analyze the diagnostic performance of MPF as an MPM biomarker and compare this performance with SM.
A total of 507 participants were enrolled in six cohorts: healthy control subjects (n = 101), healthy asbestos-exposed individuals (n = 89), and patients with benign asbestos-related disease (n = 123), benign respiratory disease (n = 46), lung cancer (n = 63), and MPM (n = 85). Sera were analyzed for SM and MPF levels using the Mesomark and Human MPF ELISA kit, respectively.
SM and MPF levels differed significantly between patients with MPM and participants from each other cohort (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis did not reveal a significant difference between both markers in area under curve (AUC) for distinguishing MPM from all cohorts jointly (SM = 0.871, MPF = 0.849; P = 0.28). At 95% specificity, SM and MPF had a sensitivity of 64% (cutoff = 2.00 nmol/L) and 68% (cutoff = 12.38 ng/ml), respectively. Combining both markers did not improve the diagnostic performance.
In this prospective multicenter study, MPF is validated as a highly performant MPM biomarker. The similar AUC values of SM and MPF, together with the limited difference in sensitivity, show that both serum biomarkers have an equivalent diagnostic performance.
可溶性间皮素(SM)是目前恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的参考血清生物标志物。巨核细胞促进因子(MPF)来源于同一前体蛋白,具有更高的潜在敏感性,但缺乏验证。
分析 MPF 作为 MPM 生物标志物的诊断性能,并将其与 SM 进行比较。
共纳入 6 个队列的 507 名参与者:健康对照组(n = 101)、健康石棉暴露个体(n = 89)、良性石棉相关疾病患者(n = 123)、良性呼吸道疾病患者(n = 46)、肺癌患者(n = 63)和 MPM 患者(n = 85)。使用 Mesomark 和 Human MPF ELISA 试剂盒分别分析血清 SM 和 MPF 水平。
MPM 患者与其他队列参与者的 SM 和 MPF 水平差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,在区分 MPM 与所有队列的曲线下面积(AUC)方面,两种标志物之间没有显著差异(SM = 0.871,MPF = 0.849;P = 0.28)。当特异性为 95%时,SM 和 MPF 的敏感性分别为 64%(截定点 = 2.00 nmol/L)和 68%(截定点 = 12.38 ng/ml)。联合使用两种标志物并未提高诊断性能。
在这项前瞻性多中心研究中,MPF 被验证为一种高性能的 MPM 生物标志物。SM 和 MPF 的 AUC 值相似,敏感性差异有限,表明这两种血清生物标志物具有同等的诊断性能。