Suppr超能文献

评价缓释氢吗啡酮与即释氢吗啡酮的滥用潜力。

Evaluation of the abuse potential of extended release hydromorphone versus immediate release hydromorphone.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Group, Kendle Early Stage, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;30(1):25-33. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181c8f088.

Abstract

Immediate release (IR) hydromorphone has experienced significant misuse and abuse. An extended release (ER) hydromorphone formulation has been developed to provide sustained pain relief and may reduce the likelihood for abuse by delaying absorption. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-part crossover study, the abuse potential of single oral doses of hydromorphone ER (intact: 16-, 32-, and 64-mg; milled: 8-mg) was compared with 8-mg hydromorphone IR and placebo. After drug administration, subjects with a history of recreational opioid use completed a series of assessments, including subjective effects visual analog scales (eg, drug liking) and Addiction Research Center Inventory With Cole Modification, at several timepoints up to 48 hours postdose. Independent of formulation, maximum at-the-moment drug liking was higher for hydromorphone versus placebo. Maximum drug liking occurred earlier and was higher for 8-mg IR versus 16-mg ER but similar to 32- and 64-mg ER. Most positive effects were lower after 16-mg ER compared with other doses, including 8-mg IR. Bad drug effects were higher for hydromorphone ER, particularly the 64-mg dose. Milled 8-mg ER produced similar subjective effects to 8-mg IR. Comparison of scores after administration of 8-mg IR on 2 separate occasions showed that most assessments exhibited good test-retest reliability, although some scores declined marginally between test and retest. Delayed onset of good drug effects and prominent bad drug effects of hydromorphone ER suggest that, when administered intact, this formulation may have lower abuse potential than hydromorphone IR.

摘要

盐酸氢吗啡酮速释制剂的误用和滥用现象十分严重。为了提供持续的止痛效果,并减少药物滥用的可能性,盐酸氢吗啡酮缓释制剂被开发出来,其通过延缓药物吸收来达到上述目的。在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、两部分交叉研究中,比较了单口服剂量盐酸氢吗啡酮缓释制剂(完整制剂:16、32 和 64mg;粉碎制剂:8mg)与 8mg 盐酸氢吗啡酮速释制剂和安慰剂的药物滥用潜力。在给药后,有过消遣性阿片类药物使用史的受试者完成了一系列评估,包括主观效应视觉模拟量表(例如,药物喜好)和成瘾研究中心问卷(Cole 改良版),评估时间点截至给药后 48 小时。无论制剂如何,与安慰剂相比,盐酸氢吗啡酮的即时最大药物喜好度更高。8mg 速释制剂的最大药物喜好度出现更早且更高,与 16mg 和 32mg 缓释制剂相似。与其他剂量相比,16mg 缓释制剂后大多数积极的药物效应较低,包括 8mg 速释制剂。盐酸氢吗啡酮缓释制剂的不良药物效应更高,尤其是 64mg 剂量。粉碎后的 8mg 缓释制剂产生的主观效应与 8mg 速释制剂相似。两次分别给予 8mg 速释制剂后的评分比较表明,大多数评估都具有良好的测试-重测可靠性,尽管一些评分在测试和重测之间略有下降。盐酸氢吗啡酮缓释制剂起效时间延迟,不良药物效应明显,提示当完整给药时,该制剂的药物滥用潜力可能低于盐酸氢吗啡酮速释制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验