Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Mar;20(2):125-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328336258f.
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) continues to provide a minimally invasive option to the management of bladder cancer. Its utilization appears to be steadily increasing. The purpose of this paper is to review recent advances and outcomes related to robot-assisted radical cystectomy.
There are an increasing number of publications and abstracts related to robot-assisted radical cystectomy. In a majority of these case series, the urinary diversion is performed extracorporeally due to improved operative times. There has been some larger series published within the last year, which have provided some meaningful insight into the perioperative and oncologic issues related to the procedure. Several of these reports have provided a retrospective comparison to open radical cystectomy. In experienced hands, this procedure can be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time with appropriate pathologic outcomes, whereas providing decreased complication rates, EBL, and transfusion rates as well as improved convalescence compared with open-radical cystectomy. Although no long-term survival data exists to date, intermediate-term follow-up is beginning to emerge and appears similar to open-radical cystectomy in nonrandomized comparisons.
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is a reproducible, minimally invasive approach to radical cystectomy. Patients appear to derive benefit from this approach in regards to complications and convalescence without evidence of compromise to early and intermediate oncological outcomes. Long-term oncologic follow-up and, ideally, randomized prospective comparisons to open radical cystectomy are needed to further validate this procedure.
机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)继续为膀胱癌的治疗提供微创选择。它的应用似乎在稳步增加。本文旨在回顾与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术相关的最新进展和结果。
越来越多的出版物和摘要与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术有关。在这些病例系列中的大多数中,由于手术时间的改善,尿流改道是在体外进行的。在过去的一年中,已经发表了一些更大的系列,为与该手术相关的围手术期和肿瘤学问题提供了一些有意义的见解。其中一些报告对开放性根治性膀胱切除术进行了回顾性比较。在有经验的医生手中,该手术可以在合理的时间内完成,具有适当的病理结果,同时降低并发症、出血量和输血率,并改善与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相比的康复情况。尽管目前尚无长期生存数据,但中期随访开始出现,并且在非随机比较中与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相似。
机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术是一种可重复的、微创的根治性膀胱切除术方法。患者在并发症和康复方面似乎从这种方法中受益,而早期和中期肿瘤学结果没有受到影响。需要长期肿瘤学随访,理想情况下是与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的随机前瞻性比较,以进一步验证该手术。