Schumacher Martin C, Jonsson Martin N, Wiklund N Peter
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Sep;19(5):527-32. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832eb386.
Open radical cystectomy with an appropriate bilateral lymph node dissection (LND) is currently the standard treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Approximately 25% of patients with stages T1-T4 N0 M0 harbour metastatic lymph nodes at the time of radical cystectomy. Results from open high volume radical cystectomy series suggest that a more extended LND provides the best survival outcomes and the lowest local recurrence rates. Currently, there is controversy whether laparoscopic or robot-assisted extended LND at radical cystectomy is technically feasible and whether it can provide oncological control equivalent to open LND series at the time of radical cystectomy.
Laparoscopic LND is technically demanding and requires prolonged operation time. Most studies to date indicate that fewer nodes are removed than with an open approach, putting a question mark to this surgical approach from an oncological point of view. Limited data on lymph node yield using a robot-assisted approach are available; however, several series found similar results as in open series.
At present, there is no conclusive evidence showing that laparoscopic LND gives similar results than open LND. Robot-assisted LND is still in its learning curve and more patient series are needed.
开放性根治性膀胱切除术联合适当的双侧淋巴结清扫术(LND)是目前肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的标准治疗方法。在根治性膀胱切除术时,约25%的T1-T4 N0 M0期患者存在转移性淋巴结。开放性大容量根治性膀胱切除术系列研究结果表明,更广泛的LND能提供最佳的生存结果和最低的局部复发率。目前,关于根治性膀胱切除术中腹腔镜或机器人辅助扩大LND在技术上是否可行,以及在根治性膀胱切除术时能否提供与开放性LND系列相当的肿瘤学控制,存在争议。
腹腔镜LND技术要求高,手术时间长。迄今为止的大多数研究表明,与开放手术相比,切除的淋巴结较少,从肿瘤学角度来看,这种手术方法存在疑问。关于机器人辅助方法的淋巴结获取量的有限数据可用;然而,几个系列的研究结果与开放手术系列相似。
目前,没有确凿证据表明腹腔镜LND与开放LND的结果相似。机器人辅助LND仍处于学习曲线阶段,需要更多的患者系列研究。