Leave current system of universal CPR and patient request of DNR orders in place.
作者信息
Feen Eli
机构信息
Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):80-1. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460970.
PMID:20077352
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Leave current system of universal CPR and patient request of DNR orders in place.保留当前的通用心肺复苏系统以及患者对“不要复苏”医嘱的要求。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):80-1. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460970.
2
Levels of intervention: communicating with more precision about planned use of critical interventions.干预级别：更精确地传达关于关键干预措施计划使用的信息。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):78-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460947.
3
The conversation around CPR/DNR should not be revived--at least for now.关于心肺复苏术/放弃抢救的讨论不应再被提起——至少目前如此。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):84-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460988.
4
Restricting CPR to patients who provide informed consent will not permit physicians to unilaterally refuse requested CPR.将心肺复苏术限制在已提供知情同意的患者身上，并不允许医生单方面拒绝所要求的心肺复苏术。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):82-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460996.
5
Practical considerations for reviving the CPR/DNR conversation.重启心肺复苏术/放弃心肺复苏术讨论的实际考量
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):74-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460889.
6
History matters.历史很重要。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):76-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460897.
7
It's bigger than CPR and futility: withholding medically inappropriate care.这比心肺复苏和医疗无效更重要：拒绝不适当的医疗护理。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):70-1. doi: 10.1080/15265161003622089.
8
Resuscitation strategies in the United States: realities of hospital and prehospital treatment.美国的复苏策略：医院及院前治疗的实际情况
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):72-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160903441053.
9
Finite knowledge/finite power: "death panels" and the limits of medicine.有限的知识/有限的力量：“死亡小组”与医学的局限
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):W7-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160903493070.
10
Reviving the conversation around CPR/DNR.重新探讨心肺复苏术（CPR）/ 不施行心肺复苏术（DNR）的问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):61-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160903469328.
Zotero 插件