Clinics of Vascular Surgery, University Clinics of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Feb;27(2):174-80. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e32832ff528.
The concept of opioid-induced hyperalgesia has recently gained prominence as a contributing factor for long-term treatment failure.
To evaluate possible differences of opioids used in anaesthesia, cumulative doses of sufentanil and remifentanil were compared with escalating doses of the oripavine derivative etorphine, in awake and trained canines. This was followed by naloxone unmasking a possible hyperalgesic state, which had developed during opioid administration. Heart rate, blood pressure and propagation of nociceptive volleys in somatosensory-evoked potentials as well as the skin-twitch reflex were evaluated.
Opioid-related hypotension and bradycardia were reversed by naloxone with a late (30 min) overshoot of R43 and R17% after remifentanil and sufentanil, respectively. Following etorphine, overshoot in mean blood pressure was R9%, whereas heart rate still remained below S9% when compared with control. Peak hyperalgesia, as detected in the somatosensory-evoked potential and skin-twitch, increased by R70% after remifentanil and by R43% after sufentanil. This reflected a significant (P<0.005) increase in propagation of nociceptive afferents as late as 30 min after naloxone reversal. Such potentiation was not observed in the etorphine group, as peak somatosensory-evoked potential deflection and skin-twitch remained below S80% when compared with control.
The pure mu-agonists sufentanil or remifentanil seem to induce a 'bimodal' inhibitory followed by an excitatory effect. The latter is unmasked by naloxone in the postadministration period. In contrast, this is not seen with etorphine, a close congener of buprenorphine. The proposed mode of action of such hyperexcitatory effects may involve second-messenger-mediated G-protein activation, originally proposed by others. Ligands of the oripavine series may present an alternative for prevention of opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients.
阿片类药物诱导痛觉过敏的概念最近备受关注,被认为是长期治疗失败的一个原因。
为了评估麻醉中使用的阿片类药物的可能差异,比较了舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼的累积剂量与逐渐增加的奥啡烷衍生物依托啡的剂量,在清醒和训练有素的犬中进行。随后用纳洛酮揭示阿片类药物给药期间可能出现的痛觉过敏状态。评估心率、血压和体感诱发电位中伤害性冲动的传播以及皮肤抽搐反射。
纳洛酮逆转了与阿片类药物相关的低血压和心动过缓,瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼分别在 30 分钟后出现 R43%和 R17%的过度反应。依托啡后,平均血压的过度反应为 R9%,而与对照相比,心率仍低于 S9%。体感诱发电位和皮肤抽搐中检测到的峰值痛觉过敏分别增加了瑞芬太尼的 R70%和舒芬太尼的 R43%。这反映了在纳洛酮逆转后 30 分钟,伤害性传入纤维的传播显著增加(P<0.005)。依托啡组未观察到这种增强作用,因为体感诱发电位峰值偏转和皮肤抽搐与对照相比仍低于 S80%。
纯 μ 激动剂舒芬太尼或瑞芬太尼似乎会引起“双相”抑制,随后是兴奋作用。后者在给药后被纳洛酮揭示。相比之下,依托啡(丁丙诺啡的近亲)则不会出现这种情况。这种超兴奋性作用的拟议作用机制可能涉及第二信使介导的 G 蛋白激活,这是其他人最初提出的。奥啡烷系列的配体可能为预防患者的阿片类药物诱导痛觉过敏提供一种替代方案。