Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
To compare, in patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) and low heart rates, image quality, diagnostic performance, and radiation dose values of prospectively and retrospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenoses.
Two-hundred consecutive patients with heart rates ≤70 bpm were retrospectively enrolled; 100 patients undergoing prospectively ECG-gated CTCA (group 1) and 100 patients undergoing retrospectively-gated CTCA (group 2). Coronary artery segments were assessed for image quality and significant luminal diameter narrowing. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracy of both CTCA groups were determined using conventional catheter angiography (CCA) as reference standard. Radiation dose values were calculated.
Both groups were comparable regarding gender, body weight, cardiovascular risk profile, severity of CAD, mean heart rate, heart rate variability, and Agatston score (all p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of non-assessable coronary segments between group 1 (1.6%, 24/1404) and group 2 (1.4%, 19/1385; p=0.77); non-diagnostic image quality was significantly (p<0.001) more often attributed to stair step artifacts in group 1. Segment-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 98%, 98%, 88%, 100%, and 100% among group 1; 96%, 99%, 90%, 100%, and 98% among group 2, respectively. Parameters of diagnostic performance were similar (all p>0.05). Mean effective radiation dose of prospectively ECG-gated CTCA (2.2±0.4 mSv) was significantly (p<0.0001) smaller than that of retrospectively ECG-gated CTCA (8.1±0.6 mSv).
Prospectively ECG-gated CTCA yields similar image quality, performs as accurately as retrospectively ECG-gated CTCA in patients having heart rates ≤70 bpm while being associated with a lower mean effective radiation dose.
比较在怀疑患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)且心率较低的患者中,前瞻性和回顾性心电图(ECG)门控双源 CT 冠状动脉成像(CTCA)在诊断显著冠状动脉狭窄方面的图像质量、诊断性能和辐射剂量值。
回顾性纳入 200 例心率≤70 次/分的连续患者;100 例行前瞻性 ECG 门控 CTCA(组 1),100 例行回顾性 ECG 门控 CTCA(组 2)。评估冠状动脉节段的图像质量和显著管腔直径狭窄。使用常规导管血管造影(CCA)作为参考标准,确定两组 CTCA 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。计算辐射剂量值。
两组患者的性别、体重、心血管风险状况、CAD 严重程度、平均心率、心率变异性和 Agatston 评分均无显著差异(均 p>0.05)。组 1(1.6%,24/1404)和组 2(1.4%,19/1385)非可评估的冠状动脉节段发生率无显著差异(p=0.77);组 1 中显著(p<0.001)更常归因于阶梯状伪影导致不可诊断的图像质量。节段为基础的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和准确性分别为组 1 中的 98%、98%、88%、100%和 100%;组 2 中的 96%、99%、90%、100%和 98%。诊断性能参数相似(均 p>0.05)。前瞻性 ECG 门控 CTCA 的平均有效辐射剂量(2.2±0.4 mSv)显著低于回顾性 ECG 门控 CTCA(8.1±0.6 mSv)(p<0.0001)。
在心率≤70 次/分的患者中,前瞻性 ECG 门控 CTCA 可获得相似的图像质量,在诊断性能方面与回顾性 ECG 门控 CTCA 一样准确,而平均有效辐射剂量较低。