Suppr超能文献

低剂量、128 层、双源 CT 冠状动脉成像:高心率和步进与旋转模式的准确性和辐射剂量。

Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode.

机构信息

University Hospital Zurich, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Heart. 2010 Jun;96(12):933-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.189100.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and radiation doses of two low-dose protocols for coronary artery imaging with second-generation, dual-source CT in comparison with catheter angiography (CA).

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective, single-centre study conducted in a referral centre enrolling 100 patients with low-to-intermediate risk and suspicion of coronary artery disease. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography and CA. Patients were randomly assigned to two different low-dose CT protocols (each 100 kV/320 mA): in group A (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated step-and-shoot (SAS) mode; in group B (n=50), CT was performed using the prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch mode (pitch 3.4). The image quality and presence or absence of significant coronary stenosis in all coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers. CA served as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

Sixty-one significant stenoses were found in group A, and 69 in group B. There was no significant difference in age (group A, 62+/-8 yrs; group B, 63+/-8 yrs; p=0.72), body mass index (group A, 26.4+/-3.1 kg/m2; group B, 25.9+/-2.8 kg/m2; p=0.41) and heart rate (HR) (group A, 58+/-8 bpm; group B, 56+/-10 bpm; p=0.66) between the groups. Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 98.6% (651/660) of segments in group A and in 98.9% (642/649) in group B, with no significant differences between groups. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 94%, 91%, 85% and 97% per-patient in group A, and 93%, 94%, 89% and 97% per-patient in group B (no significant differences). The effective radiation dose in group B (0.9+/-0.1 mSv) was significantly (p<0.01) lower than that in group A (1.4+/-0.4 mSv).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the high-pitch and the SAS mode for low-dose CT coronary angiography provide high accuracy for the assessment of significant coronary stenoses, while the high-pitch mode further significantly lowers the radiation dose.

摘要

目的

比较第二代双源 CT 低剂量冠状动脉成像与导管血管造影(CA)在诊断准确性和辐射剂量方面的差异。

设计、地点和患者:前瞻性单中心研究,在一个转诊中心纳入 100 例低危至中危且疑似冠心病的患者。所有患者均行对比增强 128 层双源 CT 冠状动脉造影和 CA。患者被随机分配到两种不同的低剂量 CT 方案(各 100kV/320mA):A 组(n=50)采用前瞻性心电图(ECG)门控步进和拍摄(SAS)模式进行 CT 检查;B 组(n=50)采用前瞻性 ECG 门控高螺距模式(螺距 3.4)进行 CT 检查。由两名盲法且独立的观察者评估所有冠状动脉节段的图像质量和是否存在显著冠状动脉狭窄。CA 作为参考标准。

结果

A 组共发现 61 个显著狭窄,B 组共发现 69 个狭窄。两组间年龄(A 组 62±8 岁;B 组 63±8 岁;p=0.72)、体重指数(A 组 26.4±3.1kg/m2;B 组 25.9±2.8kg/m2;p=0.41)和心率(A 组 58±8bpm;B 组 56±10bpm;p=0.66)均无显著差异。A 组 98.6%(651/660)的节段获得了诊断性图像质量,B 组 98.9%(642/649)的节段获得了诊断性图像质量,两组间无显著差异。A 组的每位患者的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 94%、91%、85%和 97%,B 组分别为 93%、94%、89%和 97%(无显著差异)。B 组(0.9±0.1mSv)的有效辐射剂量明显低于 A 组(1.4±0.4mSv)(p<0.01)。

结论

低剂量 CT 冠状动脉成像的高螺距和 SAS 模式均可提供评估显著冠状动脉狭窄的高准确性,而高螺距模式进一步显著降低了辐射剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验