Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 26;107(4):1301-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912756107. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
Four scenarios have been proposed for the low-temperature phase behavior of liquid water, each predicting different thermodynamics. The physical mechanism that leads to each is debated. Moreover, it is still unclear which of the scenarios best describes water, because there is no definitive experimental test. Here we address both open issues within the framework of a microscopic cell model by performing a study combining mean-field calculations and Monte Carlo simulations. We show that a common physical mechanism underlies each of the four scenarios, and that two key physical quantities determine which of the four scenarios describes water: (i) the strength of the directional component of the hydrogen bond and (ii) the strength of the cooperative component of the hydrogen bond. The four scenarios may be mapped in the space of these two quantities. We argue that our conclusions are model independent. Using estimates from experimental data for H-bond properties the model predicts that the low-temperature phase diagram of water exhibits a liquid-liquid critical point at positive pressure.
四种情景被提出来描述液态水的低温相行为,每种情景都预测了不同的热力学性质。导致每种情景的物理机制存在争议。此外,由于没有明确的实验测试,因此仍不清楚哪种情景最能描述水。在这里,我们通过结合平均场计算和蒙特卡罗模拟进行研究,在微观单元模型的框架内解决了这两个开放性问题。我们表明,四种情景中的每一种都有一个共同的物理机制,并且有两个关键的物理量决定了哪一种情景描述了水:(i)氢键的方向分量的强度和(ii)氢键的协同分量的强度。这四种情景可以在这两个量的空间中进行映射。我们认为我们的结论是与模型无关的。使用氢键性质的实验数据的估计,该模型预测水的低温相图在正压下表现出液体-液体临界点。