Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Mar;29(3):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0856-8.
Two multicentre external quality assessments (EQA) for the molecular detection and genotyping of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were arranged. Firstly, 11 samples containing various amounts of inactivated MRSA strains, meticillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCoNS) or Escherichia coli were distributed to 82 laboratories. Samples containing 102 or 103 MRSA cells were correctly scored in only 16 and 46% of the datasets returned, respectively. Two of the used MSSA strains contained an SCCmec cassette lacking the mecA gene. There was a marked difference in the percentage of correct results for these two MSSA strains (37 and 39%) compared to the MSSA strain lacking the SCCmec cassette (88%). Secondly, a panel for MRSA genotyping, consisting of ten samples (two identical, three genetically related and five unique strains) was distributed to 19 laboratories. Seventy-three percent of the datasets recorded all samples correctly. Most pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocols proved to be suboptimal, resulting in inferior resolution in the higher or lower fragment regions. The performance of molecular diagnostics for MRSA shows no significant changes since our first EQA in 2006. The first molecular typing results are encouraging. Both assessments indicate that programme expansion is required and that major performance discrepancies continue to exist.
安排了两次针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 (MRSA) 的分子检测和基因分型的多中心外部质量评估 (EQA)。首先,将含有不同数量失活的 MRSA 菌株、甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌 (MSSA)、耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌 (MRCoNS) 或大肠杆菌的 11 个样本分发给 82 个实验室。在返回的数据集分别只有 16%和 46%正确地评分了含有 102 或 103 个 MRSA 细胞的样本。两种使用的 MSSA 菌株含有一个缺少 mecA 基因的 SCCmec 盒。与缺乏 SCCmec 盒的 MSSA 菌株 (88%) 相比,这两种 MSSA 菌株的正确结果百分比存在明显差异 (37%和 39%)。其次,向 19 个实验室分发了一个用于 MRSA 基因分型的面板,其中包含十个样本(两个相同、三个遗传相关和五个独特的菌株)。73%的数据集正确记录了所有样本。大多数脉冲场凝胶电泳 (PFGE) 方案被证明是次优的,导致较高或较低片段区域的分辨率降低。自 2006 年我们的第一次 EQA 以来,MRSA 的分子诊断性能没有显著变化。第一个分子分型结果令人鼓舞。这两项评估都表明需要扩大计划,并继续存在主要的性能差异。