Department of Internal Medicine, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):457-63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b9ec33.
First, to determine whether procalcitonin (PCT) significantly adds diagnostic value in terms of sensitivity and specificity to a common set of markers of infection, including C-reactive protein (CRP), at the Emergency Department. Second, to create a simple scoring rule implementing PCT values. Third, to determine and compare associations of CRP and PCT with clinical outcomes.
The additional diagnostic value of PCT was determined using multiple logistic regression analysis. A score was developed to help distinguish patients with a culture-proven bacterial infection from patients not needing antibiotic treatment using 16 potential clinical and laboratory variables. The prognostic value of CRP and PCT was determined using Spearman's correlation and logistic regression.
Emergency Department of a 310-bed teaching hospital.
Patients between 18 and 85 years old presenting with fever to the Emergency Department.
None.
A total of 211 patients were studied (infection confirmed, n = 73; infection likely, n = 58; infection not excluded, n = 46; no infection, n = 34). CRP and chills were the strongest predictors for the diagnosis of bacterial infection. After addition of PCT to these parameters, model fit significantly improved (p = .003). The resulting scoring rule (score = 0.01 * CRP + 2 * chills + 1 * PCT) was characterized by an AUC value of 0.83 (sensitivity 79%; specificity of 71%), which was more accurate than physician judgment or SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). PCT levels were significantly associated with admission to a special care unit, duration of intravenous antibiotic use, total duration of antibiotic treatment, and length of hospital stay, whereas CRP was related only to the latter two variables.
These data suggest that PCT may be a valuable addition to currently used markers of infection for diagnosis of infection and prognosis in patients with fever at the Emergency Department.
首先,确定降钙素原(PCT)是否在急诊科常见的感染标志物(包括 C 反应蛋白 [CRP])的敏感性和特异性方面具有显著的附加诊断价值。其次,创建一个简单的评分规则来实施 PCT 值。第三,确定和比较 CRP 和 PCT 与临床结果的关联。
使用多元逻辑回归分析确定 PCT 的附加诊断价值。开发了一种评分系统,以帮助区分经培养证实的细菌感染患者和不需要抗生素治疗的患者,使用 16 个潜在的临床和实验室变量。使用 Spearman 相关和逻辑回归确定 CRP 和 PCT 的预后价值。
一家 310 张床位的教学医院的急诊科。
18 至 85 岁之间因发热就诊于急诊科的患者。
无。
共研究了 211 例患者(感染确诊,n = 73;感染可能性大,n = 58;感染未排除,n = 46;无感染,n = 34)。CRP 和寒战是细菌感染诊断的最强预测因素。在将 PCT 添加到这些参数后,模型拟合显著改善(p =.003)。由此产生的评分规则(评分= 0.01 * CRP + 2 * 寒战 + 1 * PCT)的 AUC 值为 0.83(敏感性为 79%;特异性为 71%),比医生判断或 SIRS(全身炎症反应综合征)更准确。PCT 水平与特殊护理病房的入院、静脉使用抗生素的持续时间、抗生素治疗的总持续时间和住院时间显著相关,而 CRP 仅与后两个变量相关。
这些数据表明,PCT 可能是急诊科发热患者感染诊断和预后的现有感染标志物的有价值的附加物。