Critical Care Unit, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):518-26. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0d7b.
To compare the effect of pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist on breathing pattern, patient-ventilator synchrony, diaphragm unloading, and gas exchange. Increasing the level of pressure support ventilation can increase tidal volume, reduce respiratory rate, and lead to delayed ventilator triggering and cycling. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist uses diaphragm electrical activity to control the timing and pressure of assist delivery and is expected to enhance patient-ventilator synchrony.
Prospective, comparative, crossover study.
Adult critical care unit in a tertiary university hospital.
Fourteen nonsedated mechanically ventilated patients (n = 12 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).
Patients were ventilated for 10-min periods, using two pressure support ventilation levels (lowest tolerable and +7 cm H2O higher) and two neurally adjusted ventilatory assist levels (same peak pressures and external positive end-expiratory pressure as with pressure support ventilation), delivered in a randomized order.
Diaphragm electrical activity, respiratory pressures, air flow, volume, neural and ventilator respiratory rates, and arterial blood gases were measured. Peak pressures were 17 +/- 6 cm H2O and 24 +/- 6 cm H2O and 19 +/- 5 cm H2O and 24 +/- 6 cm H2O with high and low pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, respectively. The breathing pattern was comparable with pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist during low assist; during higher assist, larger tidal volumes (p = .003) and lower breathing frequencies (p = .008) were observed with pressure support ventilation. Increasing the assist increased cycling delays only with pressure support ventilation (p = .003). Compared with pressure support ventilation, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist reduced delays of ventilator triggering (p < .001 for low and high assist) and cycling (high assist: p = .004; low assist: p = .04), and abolished wasted inspiratory efforts observed with pressure support ventilation in six subjects. The diaphragm electrical activity and pressure-time product for ventilator triggering were lower with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (p = .005 and p = .02, respectively; analysis of variance). Arterial blood gases were similar with both modes.
Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist can improve patient-ventilator synchrony by reducing the triggering and cycling delays, especially at higher levels of assist, at the same time preserving breathing and maintaining blood gases.
比较压力支持通气和神经调节辅助通气对呼吸模式、人机同步性、膈肌减负和气体交换的影响。增加压力支持通气水平可以增加潮气量,降低呼吸频率,并导致呼吸机触发和循环延迟。神经调节辅助通气使用膈肌电活动来控制辅助输送的时间和压力,并有望增强人机同步性。
前瞻性、对照、交叉研究。
一家三级大学医院的成人重症监护病房。
14 名非镇静机械通气患者(n = 12 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者)。
患者接受了 10 分钟的通气,使用了两种压力支持通气水平(最低耐受水平和增加 7 cm H2O)和两种神经调节辅助通气水平(与压力支持通气相同的峰值压力和外部正呼气末压),以随机顺序进行。
测量了膈肌电活动、呼吸压力、气流、容量、神经和呼吸机呼吸频率以及动脉血气。高压力支持通气和神经调节辅助通气的峰值压力分别为 17 +/- 6 cm H2O 和 24 +/- 6 cm H2O,19 +/- 5 cm H2O 和 24 +/- 6 cm H2O。在低辅助时,压力支持通气和神经调节辅助通气的呼吸模式相似;在较高的辅助下,压力支持通气观察到更大的潮气量(p =.003)和更低的呼吸频率(p =.008)。仅在压力支持通气时,增加辅助会增加循环延迟(p =.003)。与压力支持通气相比,神经调节辅助通气减少了呼吸机触发的延迟(低辅助:p <.001;高辅助:p =.004;低辅助:p =.04),并消除了压力支持通气中观察到的六个受试者的无效吸气努力。神经调节辅助通气的呼吸机触发的膈肌电活动和压力-时间乘积较低(p =.005 和 p =.02,分别;方差分析)。两种模式的动脉血气相似。
神经调节辅助通气可以通过减少触发和循环延迟来改善人机同步性,尤其是在较高的辅助水平下,同时保持呼吸并维持血气。