Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Microsurgery. 2010;30(2):85-90. doi: 10.1002/micr.20717.
The main advantage of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is muscle preservation. Perforating vessels, however, display anatomic variability and intraoperative decisions must balance flap perfusion with muscle or nerve sacrifice. Studies that aggregate DIEP flap reconstruction may not accurately reflect the degree of rectus preservation. At Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2004-2009, 446 DIEP flaps were performed for breast reconstruction. Flaps were divided into three categories: DIEP-1, no muscle or nerve sacrifice (126 flaps); DIEP-2, segmental nerve sacrifice and minimal muscle sacrifice (244 flaps); DIEP-3, perforator harvest from both the medial and lateral row, segmental nerve sacrifice and central muscle sacrifice (76 flaps). Although the rate of abdominal bulge was similar among groups, fat necrosis was significantly higher in DIEP-1 when compared with DIEP-3 flaps (19.8% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.049). We describe a DIEP flap classification system and operative techniques to minimize muscle and nerve sacrifice.
深部腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)乳房重建的主要优势在于保留肌肉。然而,穿支血管存在解剖学变异性,手术决策必须平衡皮瓣灌注与肌肉或神经牺牲之间的关系。汇总 DIEP 皮瓣重建的研究可能无法准确反映直肠保留的程度。在 2004 年至 2009 年期间,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 共进行了 446 例 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建手术。皮瓣分为三组:DIEP-1,不牺牲肌肉或神经(126 例);DIEP-2,节段性神经牺牲和最小程度的肌肉牺牲(244 例);DIEP-3,从内侧和外侧行采集穿支,节段性神经牺牲和中央肌肉牺牲(76 例)。尽管各组的腹部膨出率相似,但 DIEP-1 组的脂肪坏死发生率明显高于 DIEP-3 组(19.8%比 9.2%,P=0.049)。我们描述了一种 DIEP 皮瓣分类系统和手术技术,以最大限度地减少肌肉和神经牺牲。