2001 - 2004年美国特种作战部队在全球反恐战争中的死亡原因
Causes of death in US Special Operations Forces in the global war on terrorism: 2001-2004.
作者信息
Holcomb John, Caruso James, McMullin Neil, Wade Charles E, Pearse Lisa, Oetjen-Gerdes Lynne, Champion Howard R, Lawnick Mary, Farr Warner, Rodriguez Sammy, Butler Frank
机构信息
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
出版信息
US Army Med Dep J. 2007 Jan-Mar:24-37.
INTRODUCTION
Effective combat trauma management strategies depend on an understanding of the epidemiology of death on the battlefield, resulting in evidence-based equipment, training, and research requirements.
METHODS
All Special Operations Forces (SOF) fatalities (combat and noncombat) in Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF/OIF) from October 2001 until November 2004 were reviewed. All available autopsy and treatment records and photographs were used. In most cases, the immediate tactical situation was unknown. The review was performed by a multidisciplinary group including forensic pathologists, an SOF combat medic, and trauma surgeons. Fatalities were classified as having wounds that were either nonsurvivable or potentially survivable with existing training, equipment, and expertise on the battlefield. A structured review was performed evaluating the need for new equipment, training, or research requirements. Results were compared to autopsy data from Vietnam and modern civilian trauma center data. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and the US Army Institute of Surgical Research.
RESULTS
During the study period, 82 SOF fatalities were identified. Autopsies were performed on 77 Soldiers. Five casualties died secondary to aircraft crash, their bodies were not recovered from the ocean. For the purposes of this study they were considered nonsurvivable. Eighty-five percent (n = 70) of the fatalities sustained wounds that were nonsurvivable, while the remaining 15% (n = 12) had wounds that were potentially survivable. Injury Severity Score (ISS) was higher in the nonsurvivable group (p < 0.05). Truncal hemorrhage accounted for 47% of deaths while extremity hemorrhage accounted for 33%. One casualty was noted at autopsy to have a tension pneumothorax as well as multiple sources of internal hemorrhage, one suffered an airway death, while another died of sepsis 56 days after injury. Of those casualties deemed to be nonsurvivable, there were 31 patients with 40 Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) 6 injuries (p = .0011), and 53 patients with 104 AIS 5 injuries. Among the 12 deaths deemed to be potentially survivable, there were only 8 AIS 5 injuries. Deaths were largely caused by explosions (n = 35), gunshot wounds (n = 23), and aircraft accidents (n = 19). No new training or equipment needs were identified for 53% of the potentially survivable deaths while improved methods of truncal hemorrhage control need to be developed for the remainder. The review panel concluded that 85% of the deaths would not have been prevented at a civilian Level I facility. Available records, in most cases, did not contain information about the use of body armor, time to death after injury, or the ongoing tactical situation.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of deaths on the modern battlefield are nonsurvivable. Current results are not different from previous conflicts. In Vietnam, reported potentially preventable death rates range from 5% to 35% and civilian data reports potentially preventable death rates ranging from 12% to 22%. Military munitions cause multiple lethal injuries. Current trauma training and equipment is sufficient to care for 53% of the potentially survivable deaths. Improved methods of intravenous or intracavitary noncompressible hemostasis combined with rapid surgery are required for the remaining 47% of the decedents.
引言
有效的战斗创伤管理策略依赖于对战地死亡流行病学的理解,从而产生基于证据的装备、训练和研究需求。
方法
回顾了2001年10月至2004年11月伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动(OEF/OIF)中所有特种作战部队(SOF)的死亡情况(战斗和非战斗)。使用了所有可用的尸检和治疗记录及照片。在大多数情况下,即时战术情况不明。该回顾由一个多学科小组进行,成员包括法医病理学家、一名特种作战部队战斗医护兵和创伤外科医生。死亡被分类为具有不可存活的伤口或凭借战场上现有的训练、装备和专业知识有可能存活的伤口。进行了结构化回顾,评估对新装备、训练或研究需求。将结果与越南的尸检数据和现代 civilian 创伤中心数据进行比较。该研究得到了武装部队病理研究所和美国陆军外科研究所机构审查委员会的批准。
结果
在研究期间,确定了82例特种作战部队死亡。对77名士兵进行了尸检。5名伤亡人员因飞机坠毁死亡,他们的尸体未从海洋中找到。就本研究而言,他们被视为不可存活。85%(n = 70)的死亡人员遭受了不可存活的伤口,而其余15%(n = 12)有有可能存活的伤口。不可存活组的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)更高(p < 0.05)。躯干出血占死亡人数的47%,而四肢出血占33%。尸检时发现一名伤亡人员有张力性气胸以及多处内出血源,一名死于气道问题,另一名在受伤56天后死于败血症。在那些被视为不可存活的伤亡人员中,有31名患者有40处简明损伤评分(AIS)为6级的损伤(p = 0.0011),53名患者有104处AIS为5级的损伤。在12例被视为有可能存活的死亡中,只有8处AIS为5级的损伤。死亡主要由爆炸(n = 35)、枪伤(n = 23)和飞机事故(n = 19)导致。对于53%的有可能存活的死亡,未发现新的训练或装备需求,而对于其余人员,需要开发改进的躯干出血控制方法。审查小组得出结论,在 civilian I 级设施中,85%的死亡无法预防。在大多数情况下,可用记录不包含有关防弹衣使用、受伤后死亡时间或正在进行的战术情况的信息。
结论
现代战场上的大多数死亡是不可存活的。当前结果与先前冲突无异。在越南,报告的潜在可预防死亡率为5%至35%, civilian 数据报告的潜在可预防死亡率为12%至22%。军事弹药造成多处致命伤。当前的创伤训练和装备足以救治53%的有可能存活的死亡。对于其余47%的死者,需要改进静脉或腔内不可压缩止血方法并结合快速手术。