Department of Intensive Care Medicine, ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 May;54(5):622-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02202.x. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
Volumetric monitoring with right ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed (RVEDVi) and global end-diastolic volume indexed (GEDVi) is increasingly being suggested as a superior preload indicator compared with the filling pressures central venous pressure (CVP) or the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). However, static monitoring of these volumetric parameters has not consistently been shown to be able to predict changes in cardiac index (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a correction of RVEDVi and GEDVi with a measure of the individual contractile reserve, assessed by right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and global ejection fraction, improves the ability of RVEDVi and GEDVi to monitor changes in preload over time in critically ill patients.
Hemodynamic measurements, both by pulmonary artery and by transcardiopulmonary thermodilution, were performed in 11 mechanically ventilated medical ICU patients. Correction of volumes was achieved by normalization to EF deviation from normal EF values in an exponential fashion. Data before and after fluid administration were obtained in eight patients, while data before and after diuretics were obtained in seven patients.
No correlation was found between the change in cardiac filling pressures (DeltaCVP, DeltaPCWP) and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.01 and 0.00, respectively). Further, no correlation was found between DeltaRVEDVi or DeltaGEDVi and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.10 and 0.13, respectively). In contrast, a significant correlation was found between DeltaRVEDVi corrected to RVEF (DeltacRVEDVi) and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.64), as well as between DeltacGEDVi and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.59). An increase in the net fluid balance with +844 + or - 495 ml/m(2) resulted in a significant increase in CI of 0.5 + or - 0.3 l/min/m(2); however, only DeltacRVEDVi (R(2) 0.58) and DeltacGEDVi (R(2) 0.36) correlated significantly with DeltaCI. Administration of diuretics resulting in a net fluid balance of -942 + or - 658 ml/m(2) caused a significant decrease in CI with 0.7 + or - 0.5 l/min/m(2); however, only DeltacRVEDVi (R(2) 0.80) and DeltacGEDVi (R(2) 0.61) correlated significantly with DeltaCI.
Correction of volumetric preload parameters by measures of ejection fraction improved the ability of these parameters to assess changes in preload over time in this heterogeneous group of critically ill patients.
与中心静脉压(CVP)或肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)等充盈压相比,右心室舒张末期容积指数(RVEDVi)和全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDVi)的容量监测被越来越多地认为是更好的前负荷指标。然而,静态监测这些容量参数并不能始终预测心指数(CI)的变化。本研究旨在评估通过右心室射血分数(RVEF)和整体射血分数评估的个体收缩储备来校正 RVEDVi 和 GEDVi 是否可以改善 RVEDVi 和 GEDVi 监测危重病患者前负荷随时间变化的能力。
对 11 例机械通气的重症监护病房患者进行肺动脉和经心肺热稀释法的血流动力学测量。通过将容积归一化为正常射血分数的指数偏差来实现容积校正。在 8 例患者中获得了输液前后的数据,在 7 例患者中获得了利尿剂前后的数据。
心脏充盈压(DeltaCVP、DeltaPCWP)的变化与 DeltaCI 之间没有相关性(R(2) 分别为 0.01 和 0.00)。此外,DeltaRVEDVi 或 DeltaGEDVi 与 DeltaCI 之间也没有相关性(R(2) 分别为 0.10 和 0.13)。相反,DeltaRVEDVi 校正至 RVEF(DeltacRVEDVi)与 DeltaCI 之间存在显著相关性(R(2) 为 0.64),而 DeltacGEDVi 与 DeltaCI 之间也存在显著相关性(R(2) 为 0.59)。液体平衡的净增加 844 + 或 - 495 ml/m(2)导致 CI 显著增加 0.5 + 或 - 0.3 l/min/m(2);然而,只有 DeltacRVEDVi(R(2) 为 0.58)和 DeltacGEDVi(R(2) 为 0.36)与 DeltaCI 显著相关。利尿剂的应用导致液体平衡的净减少 942 + 或 - 658 ml/m(2)导致 CI 显著下降 0.7 + 或 - 0.5 l/min/m(2);然而,只有 DeltacRVEDVi(R(2) 为 0.80)和 DeltacGEDVi(R(2) 为 0.61)与 DeltaCI 显著相关。
通过射血分数测量校正容量前负荷参数,提高了这些参数在这个异质危重病患者群体中评估前负荷随时间变化的能力。