Service de réanimation médicale, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux universitaires Paris-Sud, 78, rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Faculté de médecine Paris-Sud, Inserm UMR S_999, Univ Paris-Sud, 63, rue Gabriel Péri, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0149-1. Epub 2016 May 20.
To investigate whether haemodynamic intolerance to fluid removal during intermittent renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients can be predicted by a passive leg raising (PLR) test performed before RRT.
We included 39 patients where intermittent RRT with weight loss was decided. Intradialytic hypotension was defined as hypotension requiring a therapeutic intervention, as decided by the physicians in charge. Before RRT, the maximal increase in cardiac index (CI, pulse contour analysis) induced by a PLR test was recorded. RRT was then started.
Ultrafiltration rate was similar in patients with and without intradialytic hypotension. Thirteen patients presented intradialytic hypotension, while 26 did not. In patients with intradialytic hypotension, it occurred 120 min [interquartile range 60-180 min] after onset of RRT. In the 26 patients without intradialytic hypotension, the PLR test induced no significant change in CI. Conversely, in patients with intradialytic hypotension, PLR significantly increased CI by 15 % [interquartile range 11-36 %]. The PLR-induced increase in CI predicted intradialytic hypotension with an area under the ROC curve of 0.89 (95 % interval confidence 0.75-0.97) (p < 0.05 from 0.50). The best diagnostic threshold was 9 %. The sensitivity was 77 % (95 % confidence interval 46-95 %), the specificity was 96 % (80-100 %), the positive predictive value was 91 % (57-100 %), and the negative predictive value was 89 % (72-98 %). Compared to patients without intolerance to RRT, CI decreased significantly faster in patients with intradialytic hypotension, with a slope difference of -0.17 L/min/m(2)/h.
The presence of preload dependence, as assessed by a positive PLR test before starting RRT with fluid removal, predicts that RRT will induce haemodynamic intolerance.
在进行间歇性肾脏替代治疗(RRT)时,通过在开始 RRT 前进行被动抬腿(PLR)试验,以评估患者对液体清除的血流动力学不耐受情况。
共纳入 39 例患者,这些患者决定进行间歇性 RRT 并减轻体重。透析中低血压定义为需要进行治疗干预的低血压,由主管医生决定。在开始 RRT 前,记录 PLR 试验引起的最大心指数(CI,脉搏轮廓分析)的增加。然后开始进行 RRT。
有透析中低血压和无透析中低血压的患者之间的超滤率相似。13 例患者出现透析中低血压,而 26 例患者没有出现。在出现透析中低血压的患者中,低血压发生在 RRT 开始后 120 分钟[四分位间距 60-180 分钟]。在无透析中低血压的 26 例患者中,PLR 试验未引起 CI 显著变化。相反,在有透析中低血压的患者中,PLR 使 CI 增加了 15%[四分位间距 11-36%]。PLR 引起的 CI 增加对透析中低血压的预测,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.89(95%置信区间为 0.75-0.97)(与 0.50 相比,p<0.05)。最佳诊断阈值为 9%。敏感性为 77%(95%置信区间为 46-95%),特异性为 96%(80-100%),阳性预测值为 91%(57-100%),阴性预测值为 89%(72-98%)。与对 RRT 无不耐受的患者相比,出现透析中低血压的患者 CI 下降速度明显更快,斜率差为-0.17 L/min/m(2)/h。
在开始 RRT 并进行液体清除前,通过 PLR 试验评估存在前负荷依赖,可预测 RRT 将引起血流动力学不耐受。