Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;44(2):360-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M312. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
To evaluate the literature examining the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for migraine prophylaxis.
MEDLINE (1966-October 2009) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched using the terms migraine, headache, renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, aldosterone antagonist, and the individual agents in these classes.
English-language human clinical trials, case reports, and systematic reviews were evaluated for efficacy and safety data. The references of reviewed articles were examined to identify additional sources.
Preventative trials evaluating ACE inhibitors consist of a case series, 2 open-label trials, and a placebo-controlled trial. Lisinopril reduced headache hours 20%, headache days 17%, and migraine days 21% versus placebo in the controlled trial (p < 0.05). Clinically significant (>50%) reductions in migraine measures were more common (52-66%) in open-label ACE inhibitor trials than in the controlled (32-36%) trial. Preventive trials evaluating ARBs consist of a meta-analysis, an open-label trial, and 2 placebo-controlled trials. Candesartan reduced headache hours 31%, headache days 26%, and migraine days 28% versus placebo in the first controlled trial (p < or = 0.001). Telmisartan did not reduce any prespecified primary or secondary outcome measures in the second controlled trial. Clinically significant reductions (>50%) in migraine measures were more common (54-88%) in open-label ARB trials than in the controlled (26-38%) trials. A prescription database review found that ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy halved the use of abortive migraine agents compared to diuretic therapy.
ACE inhibitors and ARBs have migraine prophylaxis activity similar to that of some currently utilized agents. Low-dose lisinopril or candesartan may be reasonable second- or third-line agents, particularly in patients with other indications for ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to delineate the role of these agents in migraine prevention.
评估血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)在偏头痛预防中的疗效文献。
使用偏头痛、头痛、肾素-血管紧张素系统、ACE 抑制剂、ARB、醛固酮拮抗剂以及这些类别的个体药物等术语,对 MEDLINE(1966 年-2009 年 10 月)和国际药学文摘进行了检索。
评估了英语人类临床试验、病例报告和系统评价的疗效和安全性数据。对综述文章的参考文献进行了检查,以确定其他来源。
评估 ACE 抑制剂的预防试验包括一个病例系列、2 个开放标签试验和一个安慰剂对照试验。在对照试验中,赖诺普利使头痛时间减少 20%、头痛天数减少 17%、偏头痛天数减少 21%(p<0.05)。与对照试验(32%-36%)相比,开放标签 ACE 抑制剂试验中偏头痛测量值的临床显著(>50%)减少更为常见(52%-66%)。评估 ARB 的预防试验包括一项荟萃分析、一个开放标签试验和 2 个安慰剂对照试验。坎地沙坦使头痛时间减少 31%、头痛天数减少 26%、偏头痛天数减少 28%(p<0.001)。在第二个对照试验中,替米沙坦并未减少任何预先指定的主要或次要结局测量值。与对照试验(26%-38%)相比,开放标签 ARB 试验中偏头痛测量值的临床显著(>50%)减少更为常见(54%-88%)。处方数据库回顾发现,与利尿剂治疗相比,ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 治疗将偏头痛急性治疗药物的使用减半。
ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 具有与某些目前使用的药物相似的偏头痛预防作用。小剂量赖诺普利或坎地沙坦可能是合理的二线或三线药物,尤其是在具有 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 治疗其他适应证的患者中。需要进一步的对照临床试验来阐明这些药物在偏头痛预防中的作用。