Santini Massimo, Lunati Maurizio, Defaye Pascal, Mermi Johann, Proclemer Alessandro, del Castillo-Arroys Silvia, Molon Giulio, Santi Elisabetta, De Santo Tiziana, Navarro Xavier, Kloppe Axel
Ospedale S. Filippo Neri, Roma, Italy.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010 Mar;27(2):127-35. doi: 10.1007/s10840-009-9454-z. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
The purpose of the trial was to quantify and compare the efficacy of two different sequences of burst anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) strategies for the termination of fast ventricular tachycardia.
The trial was prospective, multicenter, parallel and randomized, enrolling patients with an indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.
From February 2004, 925 patients were randomized and followed-up for 12 months. Eight pulses ATP terminated 64% of episodes vs. 70% in the 15-pulse group (p = 0.504). Fifteen pulses proved significantly better in patients without a previous history of heart failure (p = 0.014) and in patients with LVEF >or= 40% (p = 0.016). No significant differences between groups were observed with regard to syncope/near-syncope occurrence.
In the general population, 15-pulse ATP is as effective and safe as eight-pulse ATP. The efficacy of ATP on fast ventricular arrhythmias confirmed once more the striking importance of careful device programming in order to reduce painful shocks.
本试验旨在量化并比较两种不同序列的猝发抗心动过速起搏(ATP)策略终止快速室性心动过速的疗效。
本试验为前瞻性、多中心、平行随机试验,纳入有植入式心脏复律除颤器植入指征的患者。
从2004年2月起,925例患者被随机分组并随访12个月。8次脉冲ATP终止了64%的发作,而15次脉冲组为70%(p = 0.504)。在无心力衰竭病史的患者中(p = 0.014)以及左心室射血分数(LVEF)≥40%的患者中(p = 0.016),15次脉冲的效果明显更好。在晕厥/接近晕厥的发生率方面,两组之间未观察到显著差异。
在一般人群中,15次脉冲ATP与8次脉冲ATP一样有效且安全。ATP对快速室性心律失常的疗效再次证实了为减少痛苦电击而进行仔细设备编程的显著重要性。