School of Physiotherapy and Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010 Aug;20(4):710-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
It has been proposed that pelvic girdle pain (PGP) subjects adopt a high load motor control strategy during the low load task of the active straight leg raise (ASLR). This study investigated this premise by observing the motor control patterns adopted by pain free subjects during a loaded ASLR (ASLR+PL).
Trunk muscle activation, intra-abdominal pressure, intra-thoracic pressure, pelvic floor motion, downward pressure of the non-lifted leg and respiratory rate were compared between resting supine, ASLR and ASLR+PL. Additionally, side-to-side comparisons were performed for ASLR+PL.
Incremental increases in muscle activation were observed from resting supine to ASLR to ASLR+PL. During the ASLR+PL there was a simultaneous increase in intra-abdominal pressure with a decrease in intra-thoracic pressure, while respiratory fluctuation of these variables were maintained. The ASLR+PL also resulted in increased pelvic floor descent and greater downward pressure of the non-lifted leg. Trunk muscle activation was comparable between sides during ASLR+PL in all muscles except lower obliquus internus abdominis, which was more active on the leg lift side.
Pain free subjects respond to an ASLR+PL by a general increase in anterior trunk muscle activation, but preserve the pattern of greater activation on the side of the leg lift observed during an unloaded ASLR. This contrasts to findings in PGP subjects who, despite having a high load strategy for performing an ASLR on the symptomatic side of the body, display equal bilateral activation of the anterior abdominal wall during the ASLR. This differentiates PGP subjects from pain free subjects, supporting the notion that PGP subjects have aberrant motor control patterns during an ASLR.
有人提出,骨盆带疼痛(PGP)患者在主动直腿抬高(ASLR)的低负荷任务中采用高负荷运动控制策略。本研究通过观察无疼痛受试者在负重 ASLR(ASLR+PL)期间采用的运动控制模式来验证这一前提。
在仰卧休息、ASLR 和 ASLR+PL 三种状态下,比较了躯干肌肉激活、腹内压、胸内压、盆底运动、未抬起腿的向下压力和呼吸频率。此外,还对 ASLR+PL 进行了侧面对比。
从仰卧休息到 ASLR 再到 ASLR+PL,肌肉激活逐渐增加。在 ASLR+PL 期间,腹内压同时增加,胸内压降低,而这些变量的呼吸波动保持不变。ASLR+PL 还导致盆底下降和未抬起腿的向下压力增加。除了较低的腹内斜肌外,在 ASLR+PL 期间,所有肌肉的侧面对比中,躯干肌肉的激活都是相似的,而较低的腹内斜肌在抬腿侧更为活跃。
无疼痛受试者对 ASLR+PL 的反应是前躯干肌肉激活普遍增加,但在未负重 ASLR 中观察到的抬腿侧更大激活模式得以保留。这与 PGP 患者的发现形成对比,PGP 患者在身体症状侧进行 ASLR 时尽管采用高负荷策略,但在前腹壁的双侧激活是相等的。这将 PGP 患者与无疼痛受试者区分开来,支持了 PGP 患者在 ASLR 期间存在异常运动控制模式的观点。