University of British Columbia, Human Early Learning Partnership, College for Interdisciplinary Studies, 440-2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Health Place. 2010 May;16(3):500-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Given data limitations, neighborhood effects scholarship relies heavily on administrative data to measure area-level constructs. We provide new evidence to guide the selection of indicators from routinely collected sources, focusing on effects on early child development. Informed by an analytic paradigm attuned to the intersection of race, class, and sex, along with population-level data in British Columbia, Canada, our findings signal the need for greater precision when choosing variables in place of the now dominant approaches for measuring constructs like income/wealth, employment, family structure and race/ethnicity. We also provide new evidence about which area-level variables associate with the different domains of child development, as well as how area-level associations vary across urban and rural contexts.
受数据限制,社区效应研究主要依赖行政数据来衡量区域层面的结构。我们提供新的证据来指导从常规收集的来源中选择指标,重点是对儿童早期发展的影响。受一种分析范式的启发,该范式适应了种族、阶级和性别交叉的情况,以及加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的人口水平数据,我们的研究结果表明,在选择变量来替代现在主导的衡量收入/财富、就业、家庭结构和种族/族裔等结构的方法时,需要更加精确。我们还提供了有关哪些区域层面的变量与儿童发展的不同领域相关,以及区域层面的关联如何在城市和农村环境中变化的新证据。