An American Psychology-Law Society scientific review paper on police interrogation and confession.
作者信息
Thompson William C
机构信息
Department of Criminology, Law & Society, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
出版信息
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9213-9.
PMID:20091338
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
An American Psychology-Law Society scientific review paper on police interrogation and confession.
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9213-9.
2
Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations.
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):3-38. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
3
Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility.
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(6):757-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.774.
4
High-risk interrogation: using the "Mr. Big Technique" to elicit confessions.
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):39-40. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9203-y.
5
The need for a positive psychological approach and collaborative effort for improving practice in the interrogation room.
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):43-5. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9205-9.
6
False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
Behav Sci Law. 2012 May-Jun;30(3):342-64. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1999. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
7
Police-induced confessions, risk factors, and recommendations: looking ahead.
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):49-52. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9217-5.
8
What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?
Behav Sci Law. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):381-99. doi: 10.1002/bsl.872.
9
Lies and coercion: why psychiatrists should not participate in police and intelligence interrogations.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(4):472-8.
10
Police interviewing and interrogation of juvenile suspects: a descriptive examination of actual cases.
Law Hum Behav. 2014 Jun;38(3):271-82. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000070. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
Zotero 插件