• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需要积极的心理学方法和协作努力来改善审讯室的实践。

The need for a positive psychological approach and collaborative effort for improving practice in the interrogation room.

机构信息

University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):43-5. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9205-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10979-009-9205-9
PMID:20076996
Abstract

The White Paper suggests important reforms that will reduce the likelihood of false confessions resulting from police interrogation. The research underlying these suggested reforms has yielded significant advances in our understanding of factors associated with false confessions. As we move forward, we encourage the development of empirically based approaches that provide a viable alternative to current practice. In doing so, we suggest that researchers pursue a positive psychological approach that involves partnering with practitioners to systematically develop interrogative methods that are shown to be more diagnostic. By taking such an approach, we believe that the recommendations offered in the current White Paper can be supplemented by methods that carry the support of both scientific and law enforcement communities.

摘要

白皮书提出了重要的改革建议,以减少警察讯问导致虚假供述的可能性。这些改革建议所依据的研究在我们对与虚假供述相关因素的理解上取得了重大进展。在我们向前推进的过程中,我们鼓励发展基于经验的方法,为当前的做法提供可行的替代方案。在这样做的过程中,我们建议研究人员采用积极的心理学方法,与从业者合作,系统地开发被证明更具诊断性的讯问方法。通过采取这种方法,我们相信当前白皮书提出的建议可以通过既得到科学界又得到执法界支持的方法加以补充。

相似文献

1
The need for a positive psychological approach and collaborative effort for improving practice in the interrogation room.需要积极的心理学方法和协作努力来改善审讯室的实践。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):43-5. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9205-9.
2
High-risk interrogation: using the "Mr. Big Technique" to elicit confessions.高危审讯:使用“大先生技巧”获取口供。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):39-40. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9203-y.
3
What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?潜在陪审员对警方的审讯技巧和虚假供词了解多少?
Behav Sci Law. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):381-99. doi: 10.1002/bsl.872.
4
Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility.警方关于青少年审讯及审讯易受暗示性的做法与认知。
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(6):757-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.774.
5
Police-induced confessions, risk factors, and recommendations: looking ahead.警察诱导的口供、风险因素和建议:展望未来。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):49-52. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9217-5.
6
Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations.警察诱导的口供:风险因素与建议。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):3-38. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
7
An American Psychology-Law Society scientific review paper on police interrogation and confession.美国心理学与法律协会关于警方审讯与供述的一篇科学综述论文。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9213-9.
8
Videotaped interrogations and confessions: does a dual-camera approach yield unbiased and accurate evaluations?录像审讯与供词:双摄像头方法能否产生公正准确的评估?
Behav Sci Law. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):451-66. doi: 10.1002/bsl.875.
9
Inside interrogation: the lie, the bluff, and false confessions.审讯室里的谎言、虚张声势和虚假口供
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Aug;35(4):327-37. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9244-2.
10
False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.虚假证据策略和审讯:模拟陪审员对虚假证据策略类型、欺骗、胁迫和正当化的看法。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 May-Jun;30(3):342-64. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1999. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A systematic review update and extension.访谈与审讯方法及其对真假供述的影响:系统评价的更新与扩展
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 10;20(4):e1441. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1441. eCollection 2024 Dec.