Nelson Richard L
Department of General Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, Yorkshire, UK, S5 7AU.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD002199. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002199.pub3.
Operative techniques commonly used for fissure in ano include: anal stretch, open lateral sphincterotomy, closed lateral sphincterotomy, posterior midline sphincterotomy and to a lesser extent dermal flap coverage of the fissure. Reports of direct comparisons between operative techniques for anal fissure are variable in their results. These reports are either subject to selection bias (in non-randomized studies) or observer bias (in all studies) or have inadequate numbers of patients enrolled to answer the question of efficacy.
To determine the best technique for fissure surgery.
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE (1965-2008), Medline (Pubmed) and Embase were searched July 2008. The list of cited references in all included reports and several study authors also were helpful in finding additional comparative studies.A total of five new trials were included in this version of the review.
All reports in which there was a direct comparison between at least two operative techniques were reviewed and when more than one report existed for any given pair, that report was included. If crude data were not presented in the report, the authors were contacted and crude data obtained.
The two most commonly used end points in all reported studies were persistence of the fissure and post operative incontinence of flatus. These are the only two endpoints included in the meta-analysis.
Twenty-four trials encompassing 3475 patients are included in this review . Anal stretch has a higher risk of fissure persistence than internal sphincterotomy and also a significantly higher risk of minor incontinence than sphincterotomy. The combined results of open versus closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy show little difference between the two procedures both in fissure persistence and risk of incontinence.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Anal stretch and posterior midline internal sphincterotomy should probably be abandoned in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults. For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure, open and closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy appear to be equally efficacious. More data are needed to assess the effectiveness of posterior internal sphincterotomy, anterior levatorplasty, wound suture or papilla excision.
常用于肛裂的手术技术包括:肛门扩张术、开放式侧方括约肌切开术、闭合式侧方括约肌切开术、后正中括约肌切开术,以及较少使用的肛裂皮瓣覆盖术。关于肛裂手术技术之间直接比较的报告结果各不相同。这些报告要么存在选择偏倚(在非随机研究中),要么存在观察者偏倚(在所有研究中),要么纳入的患者数量不足,无法回答疗效问题。
确定肛裂手术的最佳技术。
2008年7月检索了Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE(1965 - 2008年)、Medline(PubMed)和Embase。所有纳入报告中的参考文献列表以及几位研究作者也有助于找到更多的比较研究。本版综述共纳入了五项新试验。
对所有至少两种手术技术之间进行直接比较的报告进行了综述,对于任何给定的一对技术,如果存在不止一份报告,则纳入该报告。如果报告中未提供原始数据,则与作者联系并获取原始数据。
所有报告研究中最常用的两个终点是肛裂持续存在和术后排气失禁。这是荟萃分析中仅有的两个终点。
本综述纳入了24项试验,共3475例患者。肛门扩张术肛裂持续存在的风险高于内括约肌切开术,且轻度失禁的风险也显著高于括约肌切开术。开放式与闭合式部分侧方内括约肌切开术的综合结果显示,两种手术在肛裂持续存在和失禁风险方面差异不大。
在成人慢性肛裂的治疗中,肛门扩张术和后正中内括约肌切开术可能应被摒弃。对于那些需要进行肛裂手术的患者,开放式和闭合式部分侧方内括约肌切开术似乎同样有效。需要更多数据来评估后位内括约肌切开术、前位提肌成形术、伤口缝合或乳头切除术的有效性。