Wong May Cm, Glenny Anne-Marie, Tsang Boyd Wk, Lo Edward Cm, Worthington Helen V, Marinho Valeria Cc
Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 3B20, 3/F, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong, China.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD007693. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007693.pub2.
For many years, topical use of fluorides has gained greater popularity than systemic use of fluorides. A possible adverse effect associated with the use of topical fluoride is the development of dental fluorosis due to the ingestion of excessive fluoride by young children with developing teeth.
To describe the relationship between the use of topical fluorides in young children and the risk of developing dental fluorosis.
Electronic search of the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Dissertation Abstracts and LILACS/BBO. Reference lists from relevant articles were searched. Date of the most recent searches: 9th March 09.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional surveys, in which fluoride toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels, foams, paint-on solutions, and varnishes were compared to an alternative fluoride treatment, placebo or no intervention group. Children under the age of 6 years at the time topical fluorides were used.
Data from all included studies were extracted by two review authors. Risk ratios for controlled, prospective studies and odds ratios for case-control studies or cross-sectional surveys were extracted or calculated. Where both adjusted and unadjusted risk ratios or odds ratios were presented, the adjusted value was included in the meta-analysis.
25 studies were included: 2 RCTs, 1 cohort study, 6 case-control studies and 16 cross-sectional surveys. Only one RCT was judged to be at low risk of bias. The other RCT and all observational studies were judged to be at moderate to high risk of bias. Studies were included in four intervention/exposure comparisons. A statistically significant reduction in fluorosis was found if brushing of a child's teeth with fluoride toothpaste commenced after the age of 12 months odds ratio 0.70 (random-effects: 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.88) (data from observational studies). Inconsistent statistically significant associations were found between starting using fluoride toothpaste/toothbrushing before or after the age of 24 months and fluorosis (data from observational studies). From the RCTs, use of higher level of fluoride was associated with an increased risk of fluorosis. No significant association between the frequency of toothbrushing or the amount of fluoride toothpaste used and fluorosis was found.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There should be a balanced consideration between the benefits of topical fluorides in caries prevention and the risk of the development of fluorosis. Most of the available evidence focuses on mild fluorosis. There is weak unreliable evidence that starting the use of fluoride toothpaste in children under 12 months of age may be associated with an increased risk of fluorosis. The evidence for its use between the age of 12 and 24 months is equivocal. If the risk of fluorosis is of concern, the fluoride level of toothpaste for young children (under 6 years of age) is recommended to be lower than 1000 parts per million (ppm).More evidence with low risk of bias is needed. Future trials assessing the effectiveness of different types of topical fluorides (including toothpastes, gels, varnishes and mouthrinses) or different concentrations or both should ensure that they include an adequate follow-up period in order to collect data on potential fluorosis. As it is unethical to propose RCTs to assess fluorosis itself, it is acknowledged that further observational studies will be undertaken in this area. However, attention needs to be given to the choice of study design, bearing in mind that prospective, controlled studies will be less susceptible to bias than retrospective and/or uncontrolled studies.
多年来,局部用氟比全身用氟更受欢迎。与局部用氟相关的一个可能的不良反应是,正在长牙的幼儿因摄入过量氟而患上氟斑牙。
描述幼儿使用局部用氟与患氟斑牙风险之间的关系。
对Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、生物学文摘数据库、学位论文文摘数据库以及拉丁美洲和加勒比地区健康科学数据库进行电子检索。检索了相关文章的参考文献列表。最近一次检索日期:2009年3月9日。
随机对照试验(RCT)、半随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面调查,其中将含氟牙膏、漱口水、凝胶、泡沫剂、涂剂溶液和清漆与其他氟化物治疗、安慰剂或无干预组进行比较。使用局部用氟时年龄在6岁以下的儿童。
两位综述作者提取了所有纳入研究的数据。提取或计算了对照前瞻性研究的风险比以及病例对照研究或横断面调查的比值比。如果同时给出了调整后和未调整的风险比或比值比,则将调整后的值纳入荟萃分析。
纳入了25项研究:2项随机对照试验、1项队列研究、6项病例对照研究和16项横断面调查。只有1项随机对照试验被判定为偏倚风险低。另一项随机对照试验和所有观察性研究被判定为偏倚风险为中度至高。研究被纳入四项干预/暴露比较。如果在12个月龄后开始用含氟牙膏刷牙,氟斑牙的发生率有统计学意义的显著降低,比值比为0.70(随机效应:95%置信区间0.57至0.88)(观察性研究数据)。在24个月龄之前或之后开始使用含氟牙膏/刷牙与氟斑牙之间发现了不一致的有统计学意义的关联(观察性研究数据)。从随机对照试验来看,使用较高水平的氟与氟斑牙风险增加有关。未发现刷牙频率或所用含氟牙膏量与氟斑牙之间有显著关联。
在局部用氟预防龋齿的益处与患氟斑牙的风险之间应进行权衡。现有证据大多集中在轻度氟斑牙上。有微弱且不可靠的证据表明,在12个月龄以下儿童中开始使用含氟牙膏可能与氟斑牙风险增加有关。其在12至24个月龄之间使用的证据不明确。如果担心氟斑牙风险,建议6岁以下幼儿使用的牙膏氟含量低于百万分之一千(ppm)。需要更多偏倚风险低的证据。未来评估不同类型局部用氟(包括牙膏、凝胶、清漆和漱口水)或不同浓度或两者的有效性的试验应确保有足够的随访期,以便收集潜在氟斑牙的数据。由于提议进行评估氟斑牙本身的随机对照试验不符合伦理,因此承认将在该领域进行进一步的观察性研究。然而,需要注意研究设计的选择,要记住前瞻性对照研究比回顾性和/或非对照研究更不易产生偏倚。