Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil 94000, France.
Pediatr Res. 2010 Feb;67(2):117-27. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181c8eef3.
Recent advances in neonatal intensive care include and are partly attributable to growing attention for comfort and pain control in the term and preterm infant requiring intensive care.Limitation of painful procedures is certainly possible, but most critically ill infants require unavoidable painful or stressful procedures such as intubation, mechanical ventilation, or catheterization.Many analgesics (opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs)and sedatives (benzodiazepines and other anesthetic agents) are available but their use varies considerably among units. This review summarizes current experimental knowledge on the effects of sedative and analgesic drugs on brain development and reviews clinical evidence that speaks for or against the use of common analgesic and sedative drugs in the NICU but avoids any discussion of anesthesia during surgery. Risk/benefit ratios of intermittent boluses or continuous infusions for the commonly used sedative and analgesic agents are discussed in the light of clinical and experimental studies. The limitations of extrapolating experimental results from animals to humans must be considered while making practical recommendations based on the currently available evidence.
新生儿重症监护的最新进展包括并部分归因于对需要重症监护的足月和早产儿的舒适度和疼痛控制的日益关注。限制疼痛程序当然是可能的,但大多数重病婴儿需要不可避免的疼痛或应激程序,如插管、机械通气或导管插入术。有许多镇痛药(阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药)和镇静剂(苯二氮䓬类药物和其他麻醉剂)可用,但它们在各单位的使用差异很大。这篇综述总结了镇静和镇痛药对大脑发育影响的最新实验知识,并回顾了支持或反对在新生儿重症监护病房使用常用镇痛和镇静药物的临床证据,但避免了对手术期间麻醉的任何讨论。根据临床和实验研究,讨论了常用镇静和镇痛药的间歇性推注或持续输注的风险/效益比。在基于现有证据提出实际建议时,必须考虑将动物实验结果推断到人类的局限性。