National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 3R2, Canada.
Epidemiol Infect. 2010 May;138(5):730-7. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809991488. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
In this case-control study, cases [community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), n=79] and controls [community-associated methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (CA-MSSA), n=36] were defined as a laboratory-confirmed infection in a patient with no previous hospital-associated factors. Skin and soft tissue were the predominant sites of infection, both for cases (67.1%) and controls (55.6%). Most of the cases (79.7%) and controls (77.8%) were aged <30 years. Investigations did not reveal any significant statistical differences in acquiring a CA-MRSA or CA-MSSA infection. The most common shared risk factors included overcrowding, previous antibiotic usage, existing skin conditions, household exposure to someone with a skin condition, scratches/insect bites, and exposure to healthcare workers. Similar risk factors, identified for both CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA infections, suggest standard hygienic measures and proper treatment guidelines would be beneficial in controlling both CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA in remote communities.
在这项病例对照研究中,病例(社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA),n=79)和对照(社区获得性甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MSSA),n=36)被定义为无先前医院相关因素的患者的实验室确认感染。皮肤和软组织是感染的主要部位,病例(67.1%)和对照(55.6%)均如此。大多数病例(79.7%)和对照(77.8%)年龄<30 岁。调查未发现获得 CA-MRSA 或 CA-MSSA 感染的任何显著统计学差异。最常见的共同危险因素包括拥挤、先前使用抗生素、现有的皮肤状况、家庭接触有皮肤状况的人、抓痕/昆虫叮咬和接触医疗保健工作者。CA-MRSA 和 CA-MSSA 感染都确定了相似的危险因素,这表明在偏远社区控制 CA-MRSA 和 CA-MSSA 时,标准的卫生措施和适当的治疗指南将是有益的。