Oxford Clinical Trials Unit for Mental Illness, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.
Lancet. 2010 Jan 30;375(9712):385-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61828-6. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
Lithium carbonate and valproate semisodium are both recommended as monotherapy for prevention of relapse in bipolar disorder, but are not individually fully effective in many patients. If combination therapy with both agents is better than monotherapy, many relapses and consequent disability could be avoided. We aimed to establish whether lithium plus valproate was better than monotherapy with either drug alone for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder.
330 patients aged 16 years and older with bipolar I disorder from 41 sites in the UK, France, USA, and Italy were randomly allocated to open-label lithium monotherapy (plasma concentration 0.4-1.0 mmol/L, n=110), valproate monotherapy (750-1250 mg, n=110), or both agents in combination (n=110), after an active run-in of 4-8 weeks on the combination. Randomisation was by computer program, and investigators and participants were informed of treatment allocation. All outcome events were considered by the trial management team, who were masked to treatment assignment. Participants were followed up for up to 24 months. The primary outcome was initiation of new intervention for an emergent mood episode, which was compared between groups by Cox regression. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN 55261332.
59 (54%) of 110 people in the combination therapy group, 65 (59%) of 110 in the lithium group, and 76 (69%) of 110 in the valproate group had a primary outcome event during follow-up. Hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83, p=0.0023) for combination therapy versus valproate, 0.82 (0.58-1.17, p=0.27) for combination therapy versus lithium, and 0.71 (0.51-1.00, p=0.0472) for lithium versus valproate. 16 participants had serious adverse events after randomisation: seven receiving valproate monotherapy (three deaths); five lithium monotherapy (two deaths); and four combination therapy (one death).
For people with bipolar I disorder, for whom long-term therapy is clinically indicated, both combination therapy with lithium plus valproate and lithium monotherapy are more likely to prevent relapse than is valproate monotherapy. This benefit seems to be irrespective of baseline severity of illness and is maintained for up to 2 years. BALANCE could neither reliably confirm nor refute a benefit of combination therapy compared with lithium monotherapy.
Stanley Medical Research Institute; Sanofi-Aventis.
碳酸锂和丙戊酸钠半钠均被推荐为预防双相情感障碍复发的单药治疗,但在许多患者中并非完全有效。如果联合使用两种药物进行联合治疗优于单药治疗,许多复发和随之而来的残疾是可以避免的。我们旨在确定锂加丙戊酸钠是否优于双相 I 型障碍的单药治疗。
330 名年龄在 16 岁及以上的来自英国、法国、美国和意大利的 41 个地点的双相 I 型障碍患者在为期 4-8 周的联合治疗主动入组后,被随机分配接受开放标签的锂单药治疗(血浆浓度 0.4-1.0mmol/L,n=110)、丙戊酸钠单药治疗(750-1250mg,n=110)或两者联合治疗(n=110)。随机分配由计算机程序进行,研究人员和参与者都了解治疗分配。所有结局事件均由试验管理团队考虑,该团队对治疗分配进行了盲法评估。参与者接受了长达 24 个月的随访。主要结局是新发紧急情绪发作的新干预措施的启动,通过 Cox 回归比较组间差异。分析按意向治疗进行。这项研究在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 ISRCTN55261332。
在联合治疗组、锂组和丙戊酸钠组中,分别有 59(54%)、65(59%)和 76(69%)人在随访期间发生了主要结局事件。主要结局的风险比为联合治疗与丙戊酸钠相比为 0.59(95%CI 0.42-0.83,p=0.0023),联合治疗与锂相比为 0.82(0.58-1.17,p=0.27),锂与丙戊酸钠相比为 0.71(0.51-1.00,p=0.0472)。随机分组后,有 16 名参与者发生严重不良事件:丙戊酸钠单药治疗 7 例(3 例死亡);锂单药治疗 5 例(2 例死亡);联合治疗 4 例(1 例死亡)。
对于需要长期治疗的双相 I 型障碍患者,锂加丙戊酸钠联合治疗和锂单药治疗均比丙戊酸钠单药治疗更有可能预防复发。这种益处似乎与基线疾病严重程度无关,并可维持长达 2 年。BALANCE 既不能可靠地证实也不能反驳联合治疗与锂单药治疗相比的益处。
斯坦利医学研究所;赛诺菲-安万特。