Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Sport Sciences Department, Picardie Jules Verne University, Amiens Cedex, France.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):205-10. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181af5152.
This study aimed to determine the effect of 3 different recovery modes (passive [PR], active [AR], and dynamic stretching [SR]) on exercise time to exhaustion (Tlim) and cardiorespiratory and blood lactate responses during supramaximal exercise. Exercise sessions consisted of 2 series of 4 repeated, intermittent supramaximal cycling exercise interspersed in random order with PR, AR, or SR before the supramaximal continuous cycling time limit (Tlim) exercise test performed at 120% of maximal aerobic power. Ten healthy volunteer soccer athletes aged 25.7 ± 2.4 years participated in this study. During each exercise session, heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption V(O2)), blood lactate concentration, and Tlim exercise performance were recorded. Higher values were obtained in HR (p < 0.01) and in V(O)2 (p < 0.001) with SR and AR compared with PR. Moreover, lower blood lactate concentration (p < 0.01) was observed with SR and AR compared with PR. A greater Tlim exercise duration was obtained for SR compared with AR (p < 0.05) and PR (p < 0.01). Dynamic stretching appeared as the best recovery mode to enhance performance and cardiorespiratory and lactate responses during intermittent supramaximal cycling exercise.
本研究旨在确定 3 种不同恢复模式(被动[PR]、主动[AR]和动态伸展[SR])对超最大运动时的运动时间极限(Tlim)和心肺及血乳酸反应的影响。运动方案由 2 组 4 次重复的间歇性超最大自行车运动组成,随机穿插 PR、AR 或 SR,然后进行超最大连续自行车时间限制(Tlim)运动测试,测试强度为最大有氧能力的 120%。10 名健康的足球运动员,年龄 25.7±2.4 岁,参加了这项研究。在每次运动中,记录心率(HR)、耗氧量 V(O2))、血乳酸浓度和 Tlim 运动表现。与 PR 相比,SR 和 AR 时 HR(p<0.01)和 V(O2)(p<0.001)的数值更高。此外,与 PR 相比,SR 和 AR 时血乳酸浓度更低(p<0.01)。与 AR(p<0.05)和 PR(p<0.01)相比,SR 时 Tlim 运动时间更长。动态伸展似乎是增强间歇性超最大自行车运动时的表现以及心肺和乳酸反应的最佳恢复模式。