O'Dwyer P J, LaCreta F P, Daugherty J P, Hogan M, Rosenblum N G, O'Dwyer J L, Comis R L
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111.
Cancer Res. 1991 Apr 15;51(8):2041-6.
The synergistic interaction of etoposide with cisplatin in certain tumors prompted an evaluation of its potential role in the i.p. treatment of ovarian cancer and other intraabdominal malignancies. We conducted a Phase I evaluation of etoposide as a single agent to determine the maximum tolerated dose i.p., to describe dose-limiting and other toxic effects, and to examine the pharmacokinetics of etoposide in this setting. Etoposide was diluted in 2 liters of normal saline, and instilled i.p. over 10 to 25 min following maximal drainage of ascites. The dwelling time was 4 h, followed by peritoneal drainage. Twenty-two patients received 56 courses at doses which ranged from 100 to 800 mg/m2. The median age was 49, the median performance status was 1, and 18 patients had received prior chemotherapy, with or without radiation. The principal acute toxicity was abdominal pain in 10 patients; this was usually accompanied by signs of peritoneal irritation and was always responsive to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications. The major toxicity was dose-related neutropenia; Grade 3 or 4 toxicity affected five of six patients at 800 mg/m2. Thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia were also observed. The recommended dose for further study is 700 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of etoposide in plasma and peritoneal fluid was measured in 19 patients. Peritoneal levels over the 4-h dwelling time declined monoexponentially with a harmonic mean half-life of 3.5 h (range, 1.9 to 7.8). Plasma levels rose to a peak at 2.9 +/- 1.7 (SD) h and then declined exponentially with a harmonic mean terminal half-life of 7.7 h (range, 4.2 to 15.6). The plasma area under the concentration-time curve increased linearly with respect to dose. The relative pharmacological advantage (ratio of peritoneal to plasma area under concentration-time curve) for i.p. administration was measured as 2.8 and was independent of dose. Based on the high plasma protein binding of etoposide (94%) and the minimal protein binding in the fluid instilled i.p., the ratio of the areas under the concentration-time curves of free drug is estimated to be 4%. These results illustrate that tumor confined to the peritoneal cavity would be exposed to substantially higher free (diffusible) drug concentrations following i.p. than following i.v. administration and support the further evaluation of etoposide by this route.
依托泊苷与顺铂在某些肿瘤中的协同相互作用促使人们评估其在腹腔内治疗卵巢癌和其他腹腔内恶性肿瘤中的潜在作用。我们对依托泊苷作为单一药物进行了I期评估,以确定腹腔内最大耐受剂量,描述剂量限制性和其他毒性作用,并研究依托泊苷在此情况下的药代动力学。依托泊苷用2升生理盐水稀释,并在腹水最大引流后10至25分钟内腹腔内注入。停留时间为4小时,随后进行腹腔引流。22例患者接受了56个疗程的治疗,剂量范围为100至800mg/m²。中位年龄为49岁,中位体能状态为1,18例患者曾接受过化疗,有或无放疗。主要的急性毒性是10例患者出现腹痛;这通常伴有腹膜刺激征,且对非甾体类抗炎药总是有反应。主要毒性是与剂量相关的中性粒细胞减少;800mg/m²剂量组的6例患者中有5例出现3级或4级毒性。还观察到血小板减少、恶心呕吐和脱发。进一步研究的推荐剂量为700mg/m²。在19例患者中测量了依托泊苷在血浆和腹水中的药代动力学。4小时停留时间内的腹水水平呈单指数下降,调和平均半衰期为3.5小时(范围为1.9至7.8小时)。血浆水平在2.9±1.7(标准差)小时达到峰值,然后呈指数下降,调和平均终末半衰期为7.7小时(范围为4.2至15.6小时)。血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积随剂量呈线性增加。腹腔内给药的相对药理学优势(腹水与血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积之比)为2.8,且与剂量无关。基于依托泊苷的高血浆蛋白结合率(94%)和腹腔内注入液体中的最小蛋白结合率,游离药物浓度-时间曲线下面积之比估计为4%。这些结果表明,局限于腹腔的肿瘤在腹腔内给药后比静脉内给药会暴露于显著更高的游离(可扩散)药物浓度,支持通过该途径对依托泊苷进行进一步评估。