RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Apr;26(4):767-75. doi: 10.1185/03007991003590860.
In a phase 3 randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, first-line therapy with lapatinib plus paclitaxel significantly improved clinical outcomes based on a pre-planned analysis of ErbB2+ metastatic breast cancer patients (GSK Study #EGF30001; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00075270). Patients with ErbB2- or untested did not significantly benefit. This article focuses on the quality of life (QOL) and quality-adjusted survival outcomes (Q-TWiST) in the study.
QOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B). Changes from baseline were analyzed using ANCOVAs, repeated measures and pattern mixture modeling. The Q-TWiST method was used to examine the trade-off between toxicities and delayed progression.
The study included 579 subjects, of whom 86 were ErbB2+. In the ITT population, no significant differences in QOL or Q-TWiST scores were observed. In the ErbB2+ subgroup, the lapatinib plus paclitaxel (L + P) arm demonstrated stable FACT-B scores over the first year, while average scores for patients on P + placebo (P + pla) monotherapy decreased (change from baseline: L + P, p = 0.99; P + pla, p = 0.01). Clinically meaningful differences were observed between treatment arms on the FACT-B, Trial Outcome Index and breast cancer subscale scores. Pattern mixture models suggested more QOL differentiation between treatments among patients who progressed or withdrew early. Q-TWiST differences between the arms in the ErbB2+ subgroup ranged from 2 to 15 weeks with an L + P advantage across all utility weight combinations.
In the ITT population, results provide no evidence of QOL differences between treatment groups. In a small, prospectively-defined subgroup of ErbB2+ patients, L + P resulted in more stable QOL and more quality-adjusted survival than paclitaxel monotherapy, representing clinically important differences between treatments.
在一项 3 期随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,基于对曲妥珠单抗联合紫杉醇一线治疗转移性乳腺癌患者(GSK 研究 #EGF30001;临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT00075270)的预先计划分析,曲妥珠单抗联合紫杉醇显著改善了临床结局。曲妥珠单抗阴性或未经检测的患者未显著获益。本文重点关注研究中的生活质量(QOL)和质量调整生存结局(Q-TWiST)。
使用癌症治疗功能评估-乳房(FACT-B)评估 QOL。使用协方差分析、重复测量和模式混合模型分析从基线的变化。使用 Q-TWiST 方法检查毒性和延迟进展之间的权衡。
该研究纳入了 579 名受试者,其中 86 名患者为 ErbB2+。在意向治疗人群中,QOL 或 Q-TWiST 评分无显著差异。在 ErbB2+亚组中,曲妥珠单抗联合紫杉醇(L + P)组在第一年保持 FACT-B 评分稳定,而接受紫杉醇联合安慰剂(P + pla)单药治疗的患者平均评分下降(与基线相比的变化:L + P,p = 0.99;P + pla,p = 0.01)。在 FACT-B、试验结局指数和乳腺癌亚量表评分上,治疗组之间存在有临床意义的差异。混合模型表明,在早期进展或退出的患者中,治疗之间的 QOL 差异更大。在 ErbB2+亚组中,双臂之间的 Q-TWiST 差异在 2 至 15 周之间,所有效用权重组合均显示 L + P 有优势。
在意向治疗人群中,结果未提供治疗组之间 QOL 差异的证据。在一个小的、前瞻性定义的 ErbB2+患者亚组中,与紫杉醇单药治疗相比,L + P 导致更稳定的 QOL 和更多的质量调整生存,代表了治疗之间的临床重要差异。