Bottomley Andrew, Biganzoli Laura, Cufer Tanja, Coleman Robert E, Coens Corneel, Efficace Fabio, Calvert Hilary Allan, Gamucci Teresa, Twelves Chris, Fargeot Pierre, Piccart Martine
Quality of Life Unit, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center, Insitut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2576-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.037.
To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as first-line chemotherapy treatment.
Eligible patients (n = 275) with anthracycline-naive measurable metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to AT (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion) or AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Dose escalation of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m(2)) was planned at cycle 2 to reach equivalent myelosuppression in the two groups. HRQOL was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and the EORTC Breast Module at baseline and the start of cycles 2, 4, and 6, and 3 months after the last cycle.
Seventy-nine percent of the patients (n = 219) completed a baseline measure. However, there were no statistically significant differences in HRQOL between the two treatment groups. In both groups, selected aspects of HRQOL were impaired over time, with increased fatigue, although some clinically significant improvements in emotional functioning were seen, as well as a reduction in pain over time. Overall, global quality of life was maintained in both treatment groups.
This information is important when advising women patients of the expected HRQOL consequences of treatment regimens and should help clinicians and their patients make informed treatment decisions.
比较接受多柔比星与紫杉醇联合方案(AT)或多柔比星与环磷酰胺联合方案(AC)作为一线化疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。
符合条件的(n = 275)未曾接受过蒽环类药物治疗且可测量的转移性乳腺癌患者被随机分配至AT组(多柔比星60 mg/m²静脉推注加紫杉醇175 mg/m²静脉滴注3小时)或AC组(多柔比星60 mg/m²加环磷酰胺600 mg/m²),每3周一次,最多六个周期。计划在第2周期将紫杉醇(200 mg/m²)和环磷酰胺(750 mg/m²)剂量递增,以使两组达到等效的骨髓抑制。在基线、第2、4和6周期开始时以及最后一个周期后3个月,使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷C30和EORTC乳腺模块评估HRQOL。
79%的患者(n = 219)完成了基线测量。然而,两个治疗组之间的HRQOL在统计学上无显著差异。在两组中,HRQOL的某些选定方面随时间受损,疲劳增加,尽管在情绪功能方面有一些具有临床意义的改善,并且随着时间推移疼痛减轻。总体而言,两个治疗组的总体生活质量均得以维持。
在向女性患者告知治疗方案对HRQOL的预期影响时,这些信息很重要,并且应有助于临床医生及其患者做出明智的治疗决策。