中高危型子宫内膜癌的系统性盆腔和主动脉淋巴结切除术:淋巴结绘图和淋巴结状态预测因素的识别。

Systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer: lymph-node mapping and identification of predictive factors for lymph-node status.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charité, Campus Virchow Clinic, University Hospital, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Apr;149(2):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.021. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the metastatic pattern of intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer in pelvic and para-aortic lymph-nodes and to evaluate risk factors for lymph-node metastases.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 01/2005 and 01/2009 62 consecutive patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent a systematic surgical staging including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were enrolled into this study. Patients' characteristics, histological findings, lymph-node localization and involvement, surgical morbidity and relapse data were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed to define risk factors for lymph-node metastasis.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients (21%) with positive lymph-nodes (N1), 8 (61.5%) had both pelvic and para-aortic lymph-nodes affected, 2 (15.4%) only para-aortic and 3 (23%) only pelvic lymph-node metastases. Overall, 54% of the N1-patients had positive lymph-nodes above the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) to the level of the renal veins. Univariate analysis revealed lymph vascular space invasion (p-value: <0.001), vascular-space-invasion (p-value: <0.001) and incomplete tumor resection (p-value: 0.008) as significant risk factors for N1-status. Overall and progression-free survival was not significantly different between N1- and N0-patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the proportion of N1-endometrial cancer patients with positive para-aortic lymph-nodes is, at 76%, considerably high, and more than half of them have affected lymph-nodes above the IMA-level, lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer should be extended up to the renal veins, when indicated. The therapeutic impact of systematic lymphadenectomy on overall and progression-free survival has still to be evaluated in future prospective randomized studies.

摘要

目的

系统评估中高危子宫内膜癌盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结的转移模式,并评估淋巴结转移的危险因素。

研究设计

2005 年 1 月至 2009 年 1 月,62 例中高危子宫内膜癌患者接受了包括盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术在内的系统手术分期,这些患者被纳入本研究。分析患者的特征、组织学发现、淋巴结定位和受累情况、手术并发症和复发数据。采用单因素分析定义淋巴结转移的危险因素。

结果

在 13 例(21%)淋巴结阳性(N1)的患者中,8 例(61.5%)盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结均受累,2 例(15.4%)仅腹主动脉旁淋巴结受累,3 例(23%)仅盆腔淋巴结受累。总的来说,N1 患者中 54%的阳性淋巴结位于肠系膜下动脉(IMA)以上至肾静脉水平。单因素分析显示,淋巴管侵犯(p 值:<0.001)、血管侵犯(p 值:<0.001)和肿瘤不完全切除(p 值:0.008)是 N1 状态的显著危险因素。N1 组和 N0 组的总生存率和无进展生存率无显著差异。

结论

由于 N1 期子宫内膜癌患者中存在阳性腹主动脉旁淋巴结的比例(76%)相当高,而且超过一半的患者淋巴结受累位于 IMA 以上水平,因此当指征明确时,子宫内膜癌的淋巴结清扫术应扩展至肾静脉水平。系统淋巴结清扫术对总生存率和无进展生存率的治疗影响仍需在未来的前瞻性随机研究中进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索