Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Mar;132(3):578-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
BACKGROUND: Treatment failures in stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma (EC) are predominantly due to occult extrapelvic metastases (EPM). The impact of chemotherapy on occult EPM was investigated according to grade (G), G1/2EC vs G3EC. METHODS: All surgical-stage IIIC EC cases from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2008, from Mayo Clinic were included. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-specific risk factors were assessed for association with overall survival, cause-specific survival, and extrapelvic disease-free survival (DFS) using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: 109 cases met criteria, with 92 (84%) having systematic lymphadenectomy (>10 pelvic and >5 paraaortic lymph nodes resected). In patients with documented recurrence sites, occult EPM accounted for 88%. Among G1/2EC cases (n=48), the sole independent predictor of extrapelvic DFS was grade 2 histology (hazard ratio [HR], 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.91; P=.03) while receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy approached significance (HR 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02, 1.01; P=.0511). The 5-year extrapelvic DFS with and without adjuvant chemotherapy was 93% and 54%, respectively (log-rank, P=.02). Among G3EC (n=61), the sole independent predictor of extrapelvic DFS was lymphovascular space involvement (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.16-5.97; P=.02). Adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect occult EPM in G3EC; the 5-year extrapelvic DFS for G3EC with and without adjuvant chemotherapy was 43% and 42%, respectively (log-rank, P=.91). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy improves extrapelvic DFS for stage IIIC G1/2EC but not stage IIIC G3EC. Future efforts should focus on prospectively assessing the impact of chemotherapy on DFS in G3EC and developing innovative phase I and II trials of novel systemic therapies for advanced G3EC.
背景:IIIC 期子宫内膜癌(EC)治疗失败主要是由于隐匿性盆外转移(EPM)。本研究根据组织学分级(G),即 G1/2EC 与 G3EC,探讨化疗对隐匿性 EPM 的影响。
方法:纳入 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间在 Mayo 诊所接受治疗的所有 IIIC 期手术治疗 EC 患者。采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析评估患者、疾病和治疗相关风险因素与总生存、疾病特异性生存和盆外无复发生存(DFS)的相关性。
结果:109 例患者符合标准,其中 92 例(84%)进行了系统性淋巴结切除术(切除>10 个盆腔和>5 个腹主动脉旁淋巴结)。在有记录复发部位的患者中,隐匿性 EPM 占 88%。在 G1/2EC 患者中(n=48),唯一独立的盆外 DFS 预测因素是组织学分级 2(风险比[HR],0.28;95%CI,0.08-0.91;P=.03),而接受辅助化疗则接近显著(HR 0.13;95%CI,0.02,1.01;P=.0511)。未接受辅助化疗和接受辅助化疗的 5 年盆外 DFS 率分别为 93%和 54%(对数秩检验,P=.02)。在 G3EC 患者中(n=61),唯一独立的盆外 DFS 预测因素是血管淋巴管间隙浸润(HR,2.63;95%CI,1.16-5.97;P=.02)。辅助化疗并未影响 G3EC 患者的隐匿性 EPM;未接受辅助化疗和接受辅助化疗的 G3EC 患者的 5 年盆外 DFS 率分别为 43%和 42%(对数秩检验,P=.91)。
结论:化疗可提高 IIIC 期 G1/2EC 的盆外 DFS,但不能提高 IIIC 期 G3EC 的盆外 DFS。未来应重点前瞻性评估化疗对 G3EC 患者 DFS 的影响,并开展新型全身治疗晚期 G3EC 的 I 期和 II 期创新试验。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014-1-14
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019-11-12
Gynecol Oncol. 2001-5
Virchows Arch. 2021-2
Gynecol Oncol. 2012-6-24
Anticancer Res. 2012-1
Gynecol Oncol. 2011-6-12