Weinreb J C, Naidich D P
Department of Radiology, New York University/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York.
Clin Chest Med. 1991 Mar;12(1):33-54.
In our experience, MR has served largely as a problem-solving device, especially in those cases in which CT has proved equivocal. Magnetic resonance has been especially efficacious in evaluating cardiovascular pathology. Virtually the entire spectrum of aortic disease can be assessed accurately, making MR a reasonable alternative to CT or angiography in most cases. Indications for the use of MR in patients with thoracic neoplasia have also emerged. Magnetic resonance is more accurate than CT in assessing invasion of the chest wall and mediastinum. As a consequence, MR should be considered the imaging procedure of choice in patients with suspected Pancoast tumors. In some patients with lymphoma, MR can make a unique contribution by evaluating the response to therapy. Magnetic resonance also can be of value in assessing patients with signs of venous obstruction, especially when there is a contraindication to the use of intravenous contrast medium. Magnetic resonance is as accurate as CT in assessing most benign mediastinal pathology. The former study can easily differentiate atherosclerotic vessels or aneurysms from enlarged lymph nodes or masses, frequently obviating a more invasive study. It is especially efficacious in evaluating patients with cystic lesions, especially those with complex cysts not clearly of water density. In the hilum, MR can differentiate prominent hilar vessels from adenopathy or masses as reliably as CT. Again, in patients with renal failure or those who have documented allergies to iodinated contrast medium, MR should be the imaging procedure of choice to evaluate suspicious hila identified on plain chest radiographs. Magnetic resonance also can be used to differentiate central obstructing hilar tumors from peripheral collapsed lung. In certain cases, these findings may help determine resectability by demonstrating encasement of hilar and mediastinal vessels as well as the central airways. It should be anticipated that as technologic improvements continue to be made, MR will assume an increasingly important role in the imaging of thoracic disease.
根据我们的经验,磁共振成像(MR)主要作为一种解决问题的手段,尤其是在那些计算机断层扫描(CT)结果不明确的病例中。磁共振成像在评估心血管病变方面特别有效。几乎所有类型的主动脉疾病都能得到准确评估,这使得在大多数情况下,磁共振成像成为CT或血管造影的合理替代方法。磁共振成像在胸部肿瘤患者中的应用指征也已出现。在评估胸壁和纵隔侵犯方面,磁共振成像比CT更准确。因此,对于疑似潘科斯特肿瘤的患者,应考虑将磁共振成像作为首选的成像检查方法。在一些淋巴瘤患者中,磁共振成像通过评估治疗反应可做出独特贡献。磁共振成像在评估有静脉阻塞体征的患者时也有价值,特别是在存在静脉内造影剂使用禁忌证的情况下。在评估大多数良性纵隔病变方面,磁共振成像与CT一样准确。前者的检查能够轻松地区分动脉粥样硬化血管或动脉瘤与肿大的淋巴结或肿块,常常避免了更具侵入性的检查。它在评估囊性病变患者时特别有效,尤其是那些具有复杂囊肿且密度并非明显为水样密度的患者。在肺门区,磁共振成像与CT一样能够可靠地区分突出的肺门血管与淋巴结病或肿块。同样,对于肾衰竭患者或已记录对碘造影剂过敏的患者,磁共振成像应是评估胸部平片上发现的可疑肺门的首选成像检查方法。磁共振成像还可用于区分中央阻塞性肺门肿瘤与周围肺萎陷。在某些情况下,这些发现通过显示肺门和纵隔血管以及中央气道的包绕情况,可能有助于确定肿瘤的可切除性。可以预期,随着技术的不断改进,磁共振成像在胸部疾病成像中将发挥越来越重要的作用。